Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39671223›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2024

Multi-Omics Integration With Machine Learning Identified Early Diabetic Retinopathy, Diabetic Macula Edema and Anti-VEGF Treatment Response.

Yuhui Pang, Chaokun Luo, Qingruo Zhang, Xiongze Zhang, Nanying Liao, Yuying Ji, Lan Mi, Yuhong Gan, Yongyue Su, Feng Wen and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yuhui PangState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Chaokun LuoState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Qingruo ZhangState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Xiongze ZhangState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Nanying LiaoState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Yuying JiState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Lan MiState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Yuhong GanState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Yongyue SuState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Feng WenState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Hui ChenState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Identify optimal metabolic features and pathways across diabetic retinopathy (DR) stages, develop risk models to differentiate diabetic macular edema (DME), and predict anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy response. Methods: We analyzed 108 aqueous humor samples from 78 type 2 diabetes mellitus patients and 30 healthy controls. Ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-high-resolution-mass-spectrometry detected lipidomics and metabolomics profiles. DME patients received ≥3 anti-VEGF treatments, categorized into strong and weak response groups. Machine learning (ML) screened prospective metabolic features, developing prediction models. Results: Key metabolic features identified in the metabolomics and lipidomics datasets included n-acetyl isoleucine (odds ratio [OR] = 1.635), cis-aconitic acid (OR = 3.296), and ophthalmic acid (OR = 0.836) for DR. For early-DR, n-acetyl isoleucine (OR = 1.791) and decaethylene glycol (PEG-10) (OR = 0.170) were identified as key markers. L-kynurenine (OR = 0.875), niacinamide (OR = 0.843), and linoleoyl ethanolamine (OR = 0.941) were identified as significant indicators for DME. Trigonelline (OR = 1.441) and 4-methylcatechol-2-sulfate (OR = 1.121) emerged as predictors for strong response to anti-VEGF. Predictive models achieved R² values of 99.9%, 97.7%, 93.9%, and 98.4% for DR, early-DR, DME, and strong response groups in the calibration set, respectively, and validated well with R² values of 96.3%, 96.8%, 79.9%, and 96.3%. Conclusions: This research used ML to identify differential metabolic features from metabolomics and lipidomics datasets in DR patients. It implies that metabolic indicators can effectively predict early disease progression and potential weak responders to anti-VEGF therapy in DME eyes. Translational Relevance: The identified metabolic indicators may aid in predicting the early progression of DR and optimizing therapeutic strategies for DME.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis InhibitorsAqueous HumorDiabetic RetinopathyMachine LearningMacular EdemaVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAgedBiomarkersChromatography, High Pressure LiquidDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansLipidomicsMaleMetabolomicsMiddle AgedAngiogenesis InhibitorsBiomarkersVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVEGFA protein, human

Identifiers

PMID39671223
PMCPMC11645727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.