Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39671199›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2024

Primary Care-Based Digital Health-Enabled Stroke Management Intervention: Long-Term Follow-Up of a Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

Jie Tan, Enying Gong, John A Gallis, Shifeng Sun, Xingxing Chen, Elizabeth L Turner, Siran Luo, Jingying Duan, Zixiao Li, Yilong Wang and 11 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05792618 (Stroke Patients and Family in Rural China), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05792618 completednot on this map

Stroke Patients and Family in Rural China: A Longitudinal Study in Hebei Province

TypeobservationalSponsorDuke Kunshan UniversityRan2022 to 2024Enrolled1,299ConditionsStroke
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Jie TanSchool of Public Health, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Enying GongSchool of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
John A GallisDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Shifeng SunDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Xingxing ChenSchool of Public Health, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Elizabeth L TurnerDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Siran LuoGlobal Health Research Center, Duke Kunshan University, Kunshan, China.
Jingying DuanSchool of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Zixiao LiDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yilong WangDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Bolu YangSchool of Public Health, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Shiyu LuGlobal Health Research Center, Duke Kunshan University, Kunshan, China.
Shenglan TangGlobal Health Research Center, Duke Kunshan University, Kunshan, China.
Janet P BettgerDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Brian OldenburgBaker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
J Jaime MirandaCRONICAS Centre of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
Biraj KarmacharyaDhulikhel Hospital-Kathmandu University Hospital, Kathmandu University School of Medical Sciences, Dhulikhel, Nepal.
Sanjay KinraLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Ruitai ShaoSchool of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Shah EbrahimLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Lijing L YanSchool of Public Health, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.

Funding

Medical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Despite evidence of the short-term benefits of multicomponent primary care-based interventions, their long-term effects are unproven. Objective: To evaluate the long-term outcomes of a system-integrated technology-enabled model of care (SINEMA intervention) for stroke management for systolic blood pressure (BP) and other outcomes among patients with stroke in China. Design, Setting, and Participants: This long-term follow-up included community-dwelling clinically stable surviving participants with stroke in an open-label cluster randomized clinical trial. Of 218 villages from Nanhe County in Hebei, China, an area with suboptimal health care resources and stroke prevalence doubling the national average, 50 villages (clusters) were recruited between June 23 and July 29, 2017, and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to an intervention or a control arm (usual care). The intervention lasted 1 year (to July 31, 2018), with a posttrial observational follow-up conducted from October 1, 2022, to August 27, 2023. Interventions: Village doctors were provided with training, performance-based incentives, technical support, and customized mobile health tools to deliver monthly follow-up to patients. Patients also received daily voice messages emphasizing medication adherence and physical activity. No intervention was requested or supported during the posttrial period. Main Outcomes and Measures: Between-arm differences in intention-to-treat analyses of individual-level changes from baseline to long-term posttrial in systolic BP (primary outcome) and stroke recurrence, diastolic BP, BP control, antihypertensive medication use and regimen adherence, and disability (secondary outcomes). Results: Among a total of 1042 stroke survivors, 44 (4.2%) were lost to follow-up and 998 (mean [SD] age at baseline: 65.0 [8.2] years; 544 [54.4%] men) completed posttrial assessment at a mean (SD) period of 66.6 (3.7) months (5.5 years) after baseline. The multicomponent intervention was associated with an estimated between-arm net reduction in systolic BP of -2.8 (95% CI, -5.3 to -0.3) mm Hg (P = .03). Most secondary outcomes showed a tendency toward lasting effects, with a notable absolute net reduction of 6.0 (95% CI, -11.3 to -0.7) percentage points and risk ratio of 0.77 (95% CI, 0.61-0.99) for stroke recurrence. In subgroup analyses, significant between-arm differences were observed among women and people with lower educational attainment, lower income, and higher use of and adherence to medications. Conclusions and Relevance: In this long-term follow-up of a cluster randomized clinical trial, the 1-year intervention was associated with significantly reduced systolic BP and stroke recurrence at 5.5 years, providing evidence of long-term health and inequity-reducing benefits and holding promise for scaling up of the intervention in resource-limited settings. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05792618.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareStrokeTelemedicineAgedBlood PressureChinaDigital HealthFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID39671199
PMCPMC11645652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.