Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39671186›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

The social leverage effect: Institutions transform weak reputation effects into strong incentives for cooperation.

Julien Lie-Panis, Léo Fitouchi, Nicolas Baumard, Jean-Baptiste André

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Profitable third-party punishment destabilizes cooperation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. Institutions of public judgment established by social contract and taxation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Self-organized institutions in evolutionary dynamical-systems games.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Julien Lie-PanisMax Planck Research Group Dynamics of Social Behavior, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, 24306 Plön, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7273-7704
Léo FitouchiDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Institute for Advanced Studies in Toulouse, Toulouse School of Economics, University of Toulouse Capitole, 31080 Toulouse, France.
Nicolas BaumardDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Institute for Advanced Studies in Toulouse, Toulouse School of Economics, University of Toulouse Capitole, 31080 Toulouse, France.
Jean-Baptiste AndréDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Institute for Advanced Studies in Toulouse, Toulouse School of Economics, University of Toulouse Capitole, 31080 Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9069-447X

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) ANR-10-IDEX-0001-02Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) ANR-17-EURE-0017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Institutions allow cooperation to persist when reciprocity and reputation provide insufficient incentives. Yet how they do so remains unclear, especially given that institutions are themselves a form of cooperation. To solve this puzzle, we develop a mathematical model of reputation-based cooperation in which two social dilemmas are nested within one another. The first dilemma, characterized by high individual costs or insufficient monitoring, cannot be solved by reputation alone. The second dilemma, an institutional collective action, involves individuals contributing to change the parameters of the first dilemma in a way that incentivizes cooperation. Our model demonstrates that this nested architecture creates a leverage effect. While insufficient on its own to incentivize cooperation in the first dilemma, reputation incentivizes contributions to the institutional collective action, which, in turn, strengthen the initially weak incentives for cooperation in the first dilemma. Just as a pulley system transforms minimal muscular strength into significant lifting capability, institutions act as cooperative pulleys, transforming initially weak reputational incentives into powerful drivers of cooperative behavior. Based on these results, we suggest that institutions have developed as social technologies, designed by humans to exploit this social leverage effect, just as material technologies are designed to exploit physical laws.

Indexed as

cooperationevolutiongame theoryinstitutionsreputation

Identifiers

PMID39671186
PMCPMC11665857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.