Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39671154›Full record

ReviewDrugs & aging2025

Patient-Reported Outcomes in Geriatric Oncology-Balancing Quality of Life and Therapeutic Effectiveness Using Primary Breast Cancer as a Model.

James Francis, Mark Baxter, Dana Giza, Kwok-Leung Cheung, Ruth Parks

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs & aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Effect of early integration of supportive care in addition to standard care in patients with breast cancer: A randomised controlled trial.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

James FrancisNottingham Breast Cancer Research Centre, School of Medicine, Royal Derby Hospital Centre, University of Nottingham, Uttoxeter Road, Derby, DE22 3DT, UK.
Mark BaxterDivision of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland.
Dana GizaDivision of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Centre, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USA.
Kwok-Leung CheungNottingham Breast Cancer Research Centre, School of Medicine, Royal Derby Hospital Centre, University of Nottingham, Uttoxeter Road, Derby, DE22 3DT, UK.
Ruth ParksNottingham Breast Cancer Research Centre, School of Medicine, Royal Derby Hospital Centre, University of Nottingham, Uttoxeter Road, Derby, DE22 3DT, UK. ruth.parks@nottingham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-3832-7431

Funding

Patient Priorities Survivorship Care for Older Women with Breast CancerR03AG089057 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI GIZA, DANA ELENA · 2024 to 2024
$312k
NIA NIH HHS R03 AG089057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer remains the most prevalent cancer worldwide, necessitating advancements in its management. Surgery remains the recommended primary treatment although neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatments, such as chemotherapy, may also be indicated. However, such medications confer a risk of toxicity, often resulting in dose reductions and hospitalisations. This morbidity is particularly pertinent within older patients, for whom their experience of breast cancer is already faced through the lens of unique challenges often including comorbidity, socioeconomic decline and limited support networks. Quality of life (QoL) assessments acknowledge the impact of diagnosis and treatment on patients' psychological, emotional and physical well-being. Multiple tools exist (each with their own strengths and weaknesses) ranging from the more comprehensive [such as the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)] to the more broadly focused [including the General Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT-G)]. However, while such tools have existed for some time, there remains a gap in clinical guidance as to their integration, particularly within older patient cohorts. This article seeks to address these complexities in breast cancer decision-making by exploring how QoL assessment can best be utilised inform efficacy-tolerability trade-offs, and subsequently facilitate optimal patient-centred care.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeAgedFemaleGeriatricsHumansMedical OncologyTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.