Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39671151›Full record

ArticleCommunity mental health journal2025

Patient Voices: Lived Experiences of Decision-Making Process in Long-Term Antipsychotic Medication Treatment.

Refael Yonatan-Leus, Nili Karako-Eyal

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Community mental health journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Refael Yonatan-LeusThe Department of Psychology, The College of Management Academic Studies, Elie Wiesel St 2, Rishon Le'Zion, Israel. refael.yonatan@mail.huji.ac.il.ORCID 0000-0003-2886-2705
Nili Karako-EyalFaculty of Law, The College of Management Academic Studies, Rishon Le'Zion, Israel.ORCID 0009-0008-5131-2211

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This research explores patients' perspectives on the decision-making process for long-term antipsychotic treatment. Twenty individuals on non-compulsory antipsychotic medications were interviewed, and their responses were analyzed using grounded theory. The analysis revealed three interconnected themes that suggest a cyclical process potentially eroding patient autonomy: According to participants' accounts, they often received limited information about dependence, withdrawal symptoms, or expected treatment duration before starting medication. Subsequently, many reported developing desires to stop or reduce their antipsychotic treatment. Participants then described experiencing dismissal of their reported side effects or treatment ineffectiveness, lack of alternatives, and opposition to reduction attempts from their psychiatrists. These experiences formed a cycle where initial information gaps contributed to later challenges when attempting treatment modifications. The findings emphasize the value of comprehensive information delivery, serious consideration of patients' reported experiences, and treatment processes that enhance patients' sense of autonomy in their psychiatric care.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsDecision MakingPsychotic DisordersAdultFemaleGrounded TheoryHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPersonal AutonomyQualitative ResearchAntipsychotic AgentsAntipsychotic medicationsAntipsychotics discontinuation and reductionEthicsInformed consentPerson-centered decision-makingWithdrawal syndrome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.