Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39671150›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2025

Characteristics of hospital pharmacist interventions and their clinical, economic and organizational impacts: a five-year observational study on the French National Observatory.

Justine Clarenne, Céline Mongaret, Céline Vermorel, Jean Luc Bosson, Sophie C Gangloff, Sophie Lambert-Lacroix, Pierrick Bedouch

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Justine ClarenneUniversité de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, BIOS, UR 4691, 51100, Reims, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8400-2174
Céline MongaretUniversité de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, BIOS, UR 4691, 51100, Reims, France. cmongaret@chu-clermontferrand.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7352-4049
Céline VermorelUMR 5525, University Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, TIMC, VetAgro Sup, 38000, Grenoble, France.
Jean Luc BossonUMR 5525, University Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, TIMC, VetAgro Sup, 38000, Grenoble, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0967-6026
Sophie C GangloffUniversité de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, BIOS, UR 4691, 51100, Reims, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2651-9372
Sophie Lambert-LacroixUMR 5525, University Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, TIMC, VetAgro Sup, 38000, Grenoble, France.
Pierrick BedouchUMR 5525, University Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, TIMC, VetAgro Sup, 38000, Grenoble, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2245-0160

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince 2006, French hospital pharmacists have been able to document their interventions in the National Observatory Act-IP© and, since 2016, to assess the potential clinical, economic and organizational impacts of pharmacist interventions (PIs) via the CLEO© tool.

aimTo describe pharmacist interventions in French hospitals from 2017 to 2021 and to evaluate their potential impacts using the CLEO© tool.

methodThe study was conducted to examine PIs documented in the Act-IP© Observatory. For each intervention, the pharmacist used the CLEO© tool to evaluate the clinical impact, using a six-point scale ranging from negative to avoiding a fatality; the economic impact, i.e., whether there was a decrease or an increase in direct costs; and whether there was a positive or negative organizational impact from the health care providers' perspective.

results121,792 PIs were assessed using the CLEO© tool for at least one outcome. Interventions with a potentially significant clinical impact accounted for 84.3% interventions and were classified as follows: minor, 28.3%; moderate, 40.3%; major, 15.0%; and avoiding a fatality, 0.7%, impacts. These interventions mainly involved antineoplastics, antithrombotic agents and some antibacterial agents. Most of the pharmacist interventions led to decreases in direct costs (50.4%) and positive organizational impacts (61.0%), especially for proton pomp inhibitors.

conclusionMany PIs have positive clinical, economic and organizational impacts, which highlights the added value of pharmacists in patient safety and positive impacts on health care teams. The pertinence of PIs can now be assessed by the CLEO© tool with a broader focus than prescribers' acceptance.

Indexed as

PharmacistsPharmacy Service, HospitalProfessional RoleFranceHumansClinical pharmacy serviceDrug-related side effectHospitalPatient safety

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.