Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39671121›Full record

ArticleMycorrhiza2024

Intraspecies variation in mycorrhizal response of Medicago sativa to Rhizophagus irregularis under abiotic stress.

Aisa Kuper-Psenicnik, Jonathan A Bennett

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mycorrhiza, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aisa Kuper-PsenicnikDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 5A8, Canada.
Jonathan A BennettDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 5A8, Canada. jon.bennett@usask.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5617-7524

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant partnerships with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) improve plant resilience to stress by increasing the plant's access to and uptake of essential nutrients and water, as well as regulating the plant's stress response. The magnitude and direction of AMF effects during the relationship depend on multiple factors including plant identity and environmental context. To investigate how AMF influence plant responses to environmental stresses, we assessed the effects of drought and salinity on growth, final biomass, and reproduction of nine alfalfa (Medicago sativa) cultivars inoculated with Rhizophagus irregularis or grown alone. In absence of stress, the fungus increased nutrient content, but caused declines in biomass through a reduction in initial growth that was not overcome by a later growth spurt. Mycorrhizal fungus inoculation also magnified stress effects on growth in most scenarios, but this depended on the stress type and cultivar. For salinity, this stress increase in inoculated plants was mediated by increased salt accumulation. Flowering of each cultivar was affected by both inoculation and stress type, albeit erratically, whereas seed production was only affected by inoculation when drought stressed. We found no clear pattern distinguishing differences in mycorrhizal fungus effects on stress among cultivars; however, our results show that mycorrhizal fungus effects on plant stress responses are contingent on the plant performance metric and stress type, highlighting the complexity of responses to mycorrhizas.

Indexed as

Medicago sativaMycorrhizaeStress, PhysiologicalDroughtsFungiGlomeromycotaSalinitySymbiosisAlfalfaDroughtIntraspecies variationRhizophagus irregularisSalinityStress response

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.