ReviewHeart failure reviews2025
Peripartum cardiomyopathy in the twenty-first century: a review of the pathophysiology and clinical trials for novel disease-specific therapeutics.
Review in Heart failure reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peripartum cardiomyopathy is an idiopathic and nonischemic systolic dysfunction with onset toward the end of pregnancy and up to 5 months postpartum. Its clinical phenotype overlaps with pregnancy-associated cardiomyopathy rendering both a continuum of the same disease. Incidence varies geographically and is highest in areas where risk factors are prevalent. The understanding of its pathophysiology is constantly evolving, but a proposed two-hit model of dysfunctional vasculogenesis and genetic predisposition exacerbated by the hemodynamic stressors of pregnancy is widely accepted. The catalysis of the cleavage of prolactin into an anti-angiogenic fragment provoked by unbalanced oxidative stress forms the bedrock of its pathogenesis. Furthermore, miRNA signaling, placenta-produced factors, and a potential underlying genetic susceptibility convene to disrupt cardiac and endothelial metabolic homeostasis. The role of anti-adrenergic and anti-sarcomeric antibodies, nutritional deficiency, and mutated viral cardiotropes are understudied. There are limited randomized controlled trials for disease-specific drugs; however, most trials are targeted at the D2 receptor agonist bromocriptine. Positive primary endpoints in a large German clinical trial led to its approved use in Europe, but the U.S.A. still renders it experimental with ongoing trials evaluating its long-term efficacy and safety. Despite its popularity since the 1900s, multiple gaps in evidence regarding long-term management after myocardial recovery, management of subsequent pregnancies, optimal anticoagulation strategy, and alternative pathophysiological pathways remain unknown.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39671119What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.