Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39671076›Full record

ArticleRheumatology and therapy2025

Improvement of Fatigue in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis Receiving Tofacitinib: Analyses of a Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trial.

Laure Gossec, Jessica A Walsh, Raj Sengupta, Andrew G Bushmakin, Joseph C Cappelleri, Arne Yndestad, Oluwaseyi Dina, David Cella

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03502616 (A PHASE 3, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, STUDY OF THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF TOFACITINIB IN SUBJECTS WITH ACTIVE ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03502616 phase3completednot on this map

A phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, study of the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in subjects with active ankylosing spondylitis (as)

TypeinterventionalSponsorPfizerRan2018 to 2020Enrolled270ConditionsAnkylosing SpondylitisArmsTofacitinib
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Laure GossecSorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Paris, France. laure.gossec@aphp.fr.
Jessica A WalshDepartment of Veterans Affairs Medical Health Center, University of Utah Health and George E. Wahlen, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Raj SenguptaRoyal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Bath, UK.
Andrew G BushmakinStatistical Research and Data Science Center, Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT, USA.
Joseph C CappelleriStatistical Research and Data Science Center, Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT, USA.
Arne YndestadInflammation and Immunology, Pfizer Inc, Oslo, Norway.
Oluwaseyi DinaInternal Medicine, Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA.
David CellaDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFatigue is a key symptom in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). The objective of this analysis was to estimate the median time to initial and stable improvement events in fatigue in patients with AS receiving tofacitinib.

methodsThis post hoc analysis used data from a phase 3 trial (NCT03502616) in patients with active AS receiving tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily or placebo. Time to improvement in fatigue was assessed using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) total score, experience domain score, and impact domain score. The rapidity of improvement was assessed by time-to-event analyses (nonparametric Kaplan-Meier models); initial improvement events (i.e., time to first week of FACIT-F improvement) and stable improvement events (i.e., time to first week of FACIT-F improvement, sustained to 16 weeks) were examined.

resultsOverall, 269 patients were assessed (mean disease duration: 14.2 [standard deviation (SD): 9.8] years; mean baseline FACIT-F total score: 27.2 [SD: 9.3]). Median times to initial and stable improvement events in FACIT-F total and domain scores were significantly shorter and occurred in more patients receiving tofacitinib than placebo. Median time to initial and stable improvement events of 6 points in FACIT-F total score were 8 and 12 weeks with tofacitinib, respectively (placebo: not reached); 70.0% versus 48.5% of patients receiving tofacitinib versus placebo, respectively, experienced initial improvements of 6 points in FACIT-F total score within 16 weeks.

conclusionsImprovements in fatigue occurred more rapidly with tofacitinib than with placebo. These results may be useful for healthcare providers when discussing tofacitinib treatment expectations with patients.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03502616 (June 7, 2018).

Indexed as

Ankylosing spondylitisFatigueTofacitinib

Identifiers

PMID39671076
PMCPMC11751249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.