Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39671059›Full record

SynthesisObesity surgery2025

Understanding the Role of Different ERCP Techniques in Post-Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Patients: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Bálint Gellért, Anett Rancz, Jakub Hoferica, Brigitta Teutsch, Zoltán Sipos, Dániel S Veres, Péter Jenő Hegyi, Szabolcs Ábrahám, Péter Hegyi, István Hritz

Abstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Obesity surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Bálint GellértCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői Út 26, 1085, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0009-0002-7896-1541
Anett RanczCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői Út 26, 1085, Budapest, Hungary.
Jakub HofericaCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői Út 26, 1085, Budapest, Hungary.
Brigitta TeutschCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői Út 26, 1085, Budapest, Hungary.
Zoltán SiposInstitute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Szigeti Út 12, 7624, Pécs, Hungary.
Dániel S VeresDepartment of Biophysics and Radiation Biology, Semmelweis University, Tűzoltó U. 37-47, 1094, Budapest, IX, Hungary.
Péter Jenő HegyiCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői Út 26, 1085, Budapest, Hungary.
Szabolcs ÁbrahámDepartment of Surgery, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, H-6725 Tisza Utca 109, Szeged, Hungary.
Péter HegyiCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői Út 26, 1085, Budapest, Hungary.
István HritzDepartment of Surgery, Transplantation and Gastroenterology, Division of Interventional Gastroenterology, Semmelweis University, Üllői Út 78, 1082, Budapest, Hungary. hritz.istvan@semmelweis.hu.

Funding

Innovációs és Technológiai Minisztérium BT - ÚNKP-23-3-II-PTE-1996
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to compare enteroscopy-assisted ERCP (EA-ERCP), laparoscopy-assisted ERCP (LA-ERCP), and endoscopic ultrasound-directed ERCP (EDGE) in terms of safety and efficacy in post-Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients. We conducted a rigorous analysis based on a predefined protocol (PROSPERO, CRD42022368788). Sixty-seven studies were included. The technical success rates were 77% (CI 69-83%) for EA-ERCP, 93% (CI 91-96%) for LA-ERCP, and 96% (CI 92-98%) for EDGE. Subgroup differences were significant between the EA-ERCP and other groups (p < 0.05). The overall adverse event rates were 13% (CI 8-22%), 19% (CI 14-24%), and 20% (CI 12-31%), respectively (p = 0.49). Our findings suggest that EDGE and LA-ERCP may be more effective and as safe as EA-ERCP.

Indexed as

Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeGastric BypassLaparoscopyObesity, MorbidEndosonographyHumansPostoperative ComplicationsTreatment OutcomeEndoscopic ultrasoundEnteroscopyERCPLaparoscopySurgically altered anatomy

Identifiers

PMID39671059
PMCPMC11717856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.