Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39671049›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2025

The effect of denosumab on minimum 3-years BMD changes in patients with osteoporotic hip fractures: a propensity score matching analysis.

Chul-Ho Kim, Keunho Kim, Ji Wan Kim

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chul-Ho KimDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9233-5358
Keunho KimDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1644-7862
Ji Wan KimDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea. bakpaker@hanmail.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3524-8706

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Denosumab significantly increased lumbar spine and total hip bone mineral density in patients with hip fractures, with comparable efficacy to that in other than hip fracture patients. Its effect was more pronounced in medication-naïve patients, suggesting its efficacy regardless of hip fracture status. PURPOSE: Denosumab, a potent antiresorptive agent, has been recognised to increase bone mineral density (BMD) and reduce fracture risk in vertebrae and hips. Despite its widespread use, no sequential follow-up studies have investigated its effects on BMD in patients with hip fractures. This study aimed to analyse the effect of denosumab on BMD gain in patients with hip fractures and investigate the incidence of subsequent hip fractures.

methodsThis retrospective study analysed 371 patients treated with denosumab for at least 3 years, including 122 patients with hip fractures. 1:1 propensity score matching was used to compare BMD changes in the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck, as well as additional hip fracture incidence between the hip fracture and the other than hip fracture group. Ultimately, 122 patients in each group were compared. Subgroup analysis compared osteoporosis medication-naïve patients with those with prior medication use.

resultsThe hip fracture and other than hip fracture group exhibited significant annual increases in lumbar spine and total hip BMD, with no significant differences between them after matching. The femoral neck BMD increased significantly only in the first year. The incidence of additional hip fractures did not differ significantly between the groups. Moreover, the effect of denosumab on BMD increase was more pronounced in patients without a previous medication history for anti-osteoporosis treatment than in those with such a history.

conclusionDenosumab significantly increased lumbar spine and total hip BMD in patients with hip fractures, with comparable efficacy to that in other than hip fracture patients. Its effect was more pronounced in medication-naïve patients, suggesting its efficacy regardless of hip fracture status.

Indexed as

Bone DensityBone Density Conservation AgentsDenosumabHip FracturesOsteoporotic FracturesAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFemur NeckHip JointHumansIncidenceLumbar VertebraeMaleMiddle AgedOsteoporosisBone Density Conservation AgentsDenosumabBone mineral densityDenosumabHip fractureOsteoporosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.