Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39671048›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2025

Impact of the guidance on fracture Liaison Services and the introduction of a new fee for secondary fracture prevention in Japan: Implementation of secondary fracture prevention during hospitalization for fragility fractures.

Gaku Gondo, Jung-Ho Shin, Susumu Kunisawa, Yuichi Imanaka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Impact of a national reimbursement add-on policy on refracture risk and secondary fracture prevention after hip fracture in Japan: a population-based interrupted time series analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  7. Postoperative osteoporosis therapy and risk of re-fracture in elderly patients with hip fractures: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  8. Trends of clinical vertebral and hip fractures following local government involvement in fracture prevention from 2015 to 2021 in Kure, Japan.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Projected burden of femoral fracture surgeries in Japan through 2035: a nationwide population-based modeling study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gaku GondoDepartment of Healthcare Economics and Quality Management, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Yoshida Konoe-Cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto City, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.
Jung-Ho ShinDepartment of Healthcare Economics and Quality Management, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Yoshida Konoe-Cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto City, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.
Susumu KunisawaDepartment of Healthcare Economics and Quality Management, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Yoshida Konoe-Cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto City, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.
Yuichi ImanakaDepartment of Healthcare Economics and Quality Management, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Yoshida Konoe-Cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto City, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan. imanaka-y@umin.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4613-2159

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP23H00448Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare JP21IA1005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Japan, the publication of the Fracture Liaison Service Clinical Standard (FLS-CS) had no apparent effect on the implementation of secondary fracture prevention, but the introduction of a new management fee for secondary fracture prevention significantly promoted the implementation of secondary fracture prevention for the target disease.

backgroundSecondary fracture prevention is important for managing fragility fractures. In Japan, the FLS-CS was published in 2019, alongside the introduction of a new management fee for secondary fracture prevention, launched in 2022 for patients who underwent surgery for hip fracture. FLS programs were hospital-based. This study evaluated the impact of these interventions on the implementation of secondary fracture prevention during hospitalization for fragility fractures.

methodsUsing claims data from the Quality Indicator/Improvement Project database, patients aged 50 years or older with hip fracture who underwent surgery or with vertebral fractures were included. The publication of FLS-CS was the first intervention, followed by the introduction of the management fee as the second intervention. To evaluate the impact of these interventions, we performed an interrupted time series analysis separately for hip and vertebral fractures.

resultsFor hip fractures, there was no immediate change after the first intervention, and the monthly rate of change decreased (incidence rate ratio [IRR]: 0.985, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.979-0.991). After the second intervention, there was an immediate increase (IRR: 1.890, 1.761-2.029), and the monthly rate of change also increased (IRR: 1.050, 1.044-1.056). For vertebral fractures, the proportion of change increased only immediately after the second intervention (IRR: 1.148, 1.038-1.270).

conclusionThe publication of FLS-CS had no apparent effect on the implementation of secondary fracture prevention in patients with either hip or vertebral fractures. Conversely, the introduction of the management fee had the effect of increasing that for the target disease.

Indexed as

Osteoporotic FracturesSecondary PreventionAgedAged, 80 and overDatabases, FactualFemaleHip FracturesHospitalizationHumansInterrupted Time Series AnalysisJapanMaleMiddle AgedPractice Guidelines as TopicSpinal FracturesFracturesOsteoporosisSecondary fracture prevention

Identifiers

PMID39671048
PMCPMC11825641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.