Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39671008›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2024

Development and refinement of patient care recommendations in brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer using nominal group technique workshops.

Pauline Humphrey, Emma Dures, Peter Hoskin, Jenny Johnston, Louise Reardon, Fiona Cramp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pauline HumphreyCollege of Health, Science & Society, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK. Pauline.Humphrey@uhbw.nhs.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1313-7113
Emma DuresCollege of Health, Science & Society, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6674-8607
Peter HoskinDivision of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8323-9567
Jenny JohnstonBristol Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.
Louise ReardonBristol Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.
Fiona CrampCollege of Health, Science & Society, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8035-9758

Funding

Health Education England (HEE)/National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) ICA-CDRF-2017-03-079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePatient experiences of brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) are widely variable, with reports of difficult and traumatic experiences and aspects of care requiring improvement. The aim of this study was to develop patient care recommendations and consult with key stakeholders to review, refine and prioritise recommendations.

methodsPhase 1: Patient care recommendations were developed from qualitative exploratory study data. Phase 2: Service users and providers with recent experience of brachytherapy for LACC were recruited to online nominal group technique (NGT) workshops. Four NGT stages were followed: (1) initial voting and silent generation; (2) round robin; (3) clarification; and (4) prioritisation. Voting data were summed across the workshops, deriving inter-group scores. Qualitative data were analysed through content analysis.

resultsPhase 1: Fifty-one patient care recommendations were developed. Phase 2: Thirteen participants took part in three online NGT workshops, with a combination of service users and providers. Initial recommendations were voted on; four new recommendations were added; minor changes were made and second voting was undertaken. Recommendations were positively received with 25 recommendations scoring maximum points from all participants. An importance score above 90% was given to 46 recommendations. The remaining recommendations received scores between 74 and 90%.

conclusionsNGT workshops facilitated collaboration between key stakeholders, discussing, refining and prioritising patient care recommendations, leading to verification of achievable and relevant recommendations. These provide a foundation for future development of guidelines and subsequent implementation into clinical practice, aiming to improve consistency of care and patient experiences of brachytherapy for LACC.

Indexed as

BrachytherapyUterine Cervical NeoplasmsFemaleHumansPatient CareQualitative ResearchLocally advanced cervical cancerNominal group techniquePatient careRecommendationsWorkshops

Identifiers

PMID39671008
PMCPMC11645302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.