ArticleEuropean journal of pain (London, England)2025
Different ways to reach the same goal: Are the analgesic effects of different types of tactile stimuli similar?
Article in European journal of pain (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Different ways to reach the same goal: Are the analgesic effects of different types of tactile stimuli similar?European journal of pain (London, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTactile-induced analgesia (TIA) is a phenomenon in which different types of tactile stimulation alleviate pain via different mechanisms including empathy. As TIA plays an essential role in therapeutic situations and clinical conditions, it is crucial to determine whether specific tactile stimulations confer distinct benefits.
methodsFifty-two subjects (31 females; 21-47 years) were exposed to four distinct experimental conditions involving three types of touch provided within a simulated supportive therapeutic setting. First, a contact heat (70 s) at a pain intensity of 60/100 Numerical Pain Scale (NPS) was applied to the forearm. The pain stimulus was then given simultaneously with vibration, gentle stroking, or handholding in random order. Pain ratings were reported at 5 and 65 s of each stimulation. Given the role of empathy in TIA, we also assessed the levels of empathy experienced by the subjects and the experimenter.
resultsHandholding and vibration conditions were associated with a more rapid decrease in pain ratings compared to pain-alone (B values: handholding = -150.94 vs. pain-alone = -99.38, p = 0.01; vibration = -163.54 vs. pain-alone = -99.38, p < 0.001). Higher levels of the experimenter's empathy toward the subjects were associated with greater pain alleviation during vibration vs. pain-alone condition (B values: vibration = -56.42 vs. B pain-alone = -9.57, p = 0.04).
conclusionsVibration's potent analgesic effects may be attributed to its multi-channel analgesic mechanisms, including the therapist's empathy toward the participant. On the other hand, for handholding establishing an empathic interaction should be considered in a therapeutic setting to enhance its analgesic efficacy. SIGNIFICANCE: This article explores the effectiveness of touch-based pain relief methods and their association with empathetic therapeutic interactions. The study emphasizes the significance of positive therapeutic interactions in facilitating tactile-induced analgesia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.