Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39670543›Full record

Observational studyAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2025

The acute management of Pilon fractures (ENFORCE) study: a national evaluation of practice.

D S Hill, J R Davis, ENFORCE Collaborative

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

D S HillTorbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
J R DavisTorbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
ENFORCE Collaborative

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPilon fractures are potentially limb-threating injuries. Staged soft tissue damage control is described, but actual practices are unknown. We report a national trainee collaborative evaluating how tibial Pilon fractures are acutely managed.

methodsENFORCE was a multicentre retrospective observational study of the acute management of tibial Pilon fractures over a three-year period. Mechanism of injury, imaging, fracture classification, time to cast application, soft tissue damage control strategy and definitive management details were determined.

resultsA total of 656 patients (670 fractures) across 27 centres were reported. AO fracture classifications were: partial articular (

conclusionThe management of tibial Pilon fractures is variable, with just over half of complete articular fractures managed with the gold standard 'span, scan, plan' staged soft tissue resuscitation. A national standard of care would increase the profile and standardise management of these potentially limb-threatening injuries, together with setting them apart from more straightforward ankle fractures.

Indexed as

Fracture FixationTibial FracturesAdolescentAdultAgedCasts, SurgicalExternal FixatorsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSoft Tissue InjuriesTomography, X-Ray ComputedYoung AdultManagementPilon fractures

Identifiers

PMID39670543
PMCPMC11960713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.