SynthesisDeutsches Arzteblatt international2025
Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery.
Synthesis in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Micropulse Versus Continuous-Wave Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation in the Management of Refractory Glaucoma: A Prospective Cohort Study.Journal of glaucoma · 2026Trial
- Global research status in the treatment of glaucoma: a systematic bibliometric analysis.International journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Review
- Insights and decision-making on surgical triggers of glaucoma-related complications in congenital cataract surgery: a clinical review.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Comparative efficacy and safety of ab-interno XEN 45 gel implantation versus trabeculectomy for glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Therapeutic advances in ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundApproximately 1.4 % of the German population aged 35 to 74 suffers from glaucoma, which is one of the more common causes of blindness. The only evidence-based treatment option at present is lowering the intraocular pressure. Modern minimally invasive surgical procedures hold out the prospect of lowering the intraocular pressure without the risk of serious complications.
methodsThis is a selective review of pertinent publications retrieved by a search in PubMed, including randomized, controlled trials and meta-analyses.
resultsThe intraocular pressure can be lowered with eyedrops, laser procedures, and surgery. Trabeculectomy is the reference standard in glaucoma surgery but leads to complications in 3-15% of cases. In minimally invasive glaucoma surgery, very small stents can be implanted to lower the intraocular pressure. These proce - dures have a better safety profile but are only indicated for mild or moderate glaucoma. The Kahook Dual Blade, iStent inject, and Hydrus Microshunt procedures have been studied in randomized, controlled trials. An additional pressure-lowering effect beyond that of cataract surgery was demonstrated only for the latter two procedures (1.9 mmHg and 1.8 mmHg, respectively). Other procedures have only been investigated in cohort studies to date; a pressure-lowering effect was found for some of them. Moreover, iStent and Hydrus Microshunt have been found to slow the progression of visual field defects.
conclusionThere are robust data documenting the effect of iStent and Hydrus Microshunt in lowering the intraocular pressure and lessening the need for eyedrops. High-quality controlled trials are still needed to test the efficacy of other procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.