Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39670502›Full record

SynthesisDeutsches Arzteblatt international2025

Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery.

Bogomil Voykov, Verena Prokosch, Jan Lübke

Abstract readReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bogomil VoykovUniversity Eye Hospital, University Clinic Tuebingen; Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Cologne; Eye Center, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany.
Verena Prokosch
Jan Lübke

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundApproximately 1.4 % of the German population aged 35 to 74 suffers from glaucoma, which is one of the more common causes of blindness. The only evidence-based treatment option at present is lowering the intraocular pressure. Modern minimally invasive surgical procedures hold out the prospect of lowering the intraocular pressure without the risk of serious complications.

methodsThis is a selective review of pertinent publications retrieved by a search in PubMed, including randomized, controlled trials and meta-analyses.

resultsThe intraocular pressure can be lowered with eyedrops, laser procedures, and surgery. Trabeculectomy is the reference standard in glaucoma surgery but leads to complications in 3-15% of cases. In minimally invasive glaucoma surgery, very small stents can be implanted to lower the intraocular pressure. These proce - dures have a better safety profile but are only indicated for mild or moderate glaucoma. The Kahook Dual Blade, iStent inject, and Hydrus Microshunt procedures have been studied in randomized, controlled trials. An additional pressure-lowering effect beyond that of cataract surgery was demonstrated only for the latter two procedures (1.9 mmHg and 1.8 mmHg, respectively). Other procedures have only been investigated in cohort studies to date; a pressure-lowering effect was found for some of them. Moreover, iStent and Hydrus Microshunt have been found to slow the progression of visual field defects.

conclusionThere are robust data documenting the effect of iStent and Hydrus Microshunt in lowering the intraocular pressure and lessening the need for eyedrops. High-quality controlled trials are still needed to test the efficacy of other procedures.

Indexed as

GlaucomaMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresHumansTrabeculectomyTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID39670502
PMCPMC12416010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.