ArticlePacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing2025
Understanding TCR T cell knockout behavior using interpretable machine learning.
Article in Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Segmentation-free analysis of live-cell imaging data reveals how T cell modifications influence cancer cell aggregation dynamics.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Live-cell analyses with unsegmented images to study cancer cell response to modified T cell therapy.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genetic perturbation of T cell receptor (TCR) T cells is a promising method to unlock better TCR T cell performance to create more powerful cancer immunotherapies, but understanding the changes to T cell behavior induced by genetic perturbations remains a challenge. Prior studies have evaluated the effect of different genetic modifications with cytokine production and metabolic activity assays. Live-cell imaging is an inexpensive and robust approach to capture TCR T cell responses to cancer. Most methods to quantify T cell responses in live-cell imaging data use simple approaches to count T cells and cancer cells across time, effectively quantifying how much space in the 2D well each cell type covers, leaving actionable information unexplored. In this study, we characterize changes in TCR T cell's interactions with cancer cells from live-cell imaging data using explainable artificial intelligence (AI). We train convolutional neural networks to distinguish behaviors in TCR T cell with CRISPR knock outs of CUL5, RASA2, and a safe harbor control knockout. We use explainable AI to identify specific interaction types that define different knock-out conditions. We find that T cell and cancer cell coverage is a strong marker of TCR T cell modification when comparing similar experimental time points, but differences in cell aggregation characterize CUL5KO and RASA2KO behavior across all time points. Our pipeline for discovery in live-cell imaging data can be used for characterizing complex behaviors in arbitrary live-cell imaging datasets, and we describe best practices for this goal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.