Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39670381›Full record

ArticlePacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing2025

Spatial Clustering for Carolina Breast Cancer Study.

Hongqian Niu, Melissa Troester, Didong Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hongqian NiuDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Melissa TroesterDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Didong LiDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA, didongli@unc.edu.

Funding

Tissue Procurement & PathologyP50CA058223 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BENJAMIN CARLISLE CALHOUN · 1992 to 2026
$59.3M
UNC-CH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH &SUSCEPTIBILITYP30ES010126 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Hazel B Nichols · 2001 to 2026
$36.3M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA058223NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES010126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the Carolina Breast Cancer Study (CBCS), clustering census tracts based on spatial location, demographic variables, and socioeconomic status is crucial for understanding how these factors influence health outcomes and cancer risk. This task, known as spatial clustering, involves identifying clusters of similar locations by considering both geographic and characteristic patterns. While standard clustering methods such as K-means, spectral clustering, and hierarchical clustering are well-studied, spatial clustering is less explored due to the inherent differences between spatial domains and their corresponding covariates. In this paper, we introduce a spatial clustering algorithm called Gaussian Process Spatial Clustering (GPSC). GPSC leverages the flexibility of Gaussian Processes to cluster unobserved functions between different domains, extending traditional clustering techniques to effectively handle geospatial data. We provide theoretical guarantees for GPSC's performance and demonstrate its capability to recover true clusters through several empirical studies. Specifically, we identify clusters of census tracts in North Carolina based on socioeconomic and environmental indicators associated with health and cancer risk.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBreast NeoplasmsComputational BiologyCluster AnalysisFemaleHumansModels, StatisticalNormal DistributionNorth CarolinaSocioeconomic FactorsSpatial Analysis

Identifiers

PMID39670381
PMCPMC12764386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.