Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39670378›Full record

ArticlePacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing2025

Social Determinants of Health and Lifestyle Risk Factors Modulate Genetic Susceptibility for Women's Health Outcomes.

Lindsay A Guare, Jagyashila Das, Lannawill Caruth, Shefali Setia-Verma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Environment, lifestyle, and cancer in women.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lindsay A GuareDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA, lindsay.guare@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Jagyashila DasDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA, jagyashila.das@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Lannawill CaruthDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA, lanna.caruth@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Shefali Setia-VermaDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA, shefali.setiaverma@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.

Funding

Integrative risk modeling for early prediction of endometriosis and its long-term health outcomes R01HD110567 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SHEFALI Setia VERMA · 2023 to 2026
$2.7M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD110567
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Women's health conditions are influenced by both genetic and environmental factors. Understanding these factors individually and their interactions is crucial for implementing preventative, personalized medicine. However, since genetics and environmental exposures, particularly social determinants of health (SDoH), are correlated with race and ancestry, risk models without careful consideration of these measures can exacerbate health disparities. We focused on seven women's health disorders in the All of Us Research Program: breast cancer, cervical cancer, endometriosis, ovarian cancer, preeclampsia, uterine cancer, and uterine fibroids. We computed polygenic risk scores (PRSs) from publicly available weights and tested the effect of the PRSs on their respective phenotypes as well as any effects of genetic risk on age at diagnosis. We next tested the effects of environmental risk factors (BMI, lifestyle measures, and SDoH) on age at diagnosis. Finally, we examined the impact of environmental exposures in modulating genetic risk by stratified logistic regressions for different tertiles of the environment variables, comparing the effect size of the PRS. Of the twelve sets of weights for the seven conditions, nine were significantly and positively associated with their respective phenotypes. None of the PRSs was associated with different ages at diagnoses in the time-to-event analyses. The highest environmental risk group tended to be diagnosed earlier than the low and medium-risk groups. For example, the cases of breast cancer, ovarian cancer, uterine cancer, and uterine fibroids in highest BMI tertile were diagnosed significantly earlier than the low and medium BMI groups, respectively). PRS regression coefficients were often the largest in the highest environment risk groups, showing increased susceptibility to genetic risk. This study's strengths include the diversity of the All of Us study cohort, the consideration of SDoH themes, and the examination of key risk factors and their interrelationships. These elements collectively underscore the importance of integrating genetic and environmental data to develop more precise risk models, enhance personalized medicine, and ultimately reduce health disparities.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseLife StyleSocial Determinants of HealthAdultBreast NeoplasmsFemaleGene-Environment InteractionHumansLeiomyomaMiddle AgedMultifactorial InheritanceOvarian NeoplasmsPregnancyRisk FactorsUterine Cervical Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID39670378
PMCPMC11658798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.