Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39670372›Full record

ArticlePacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing2025

ClinValAI: A framework for developing Cloud-based infrastructures for the External Clinical Validation of AI in Medical Imaging.

Ojas A Ramwala, Kathryn P Lowry, Daniel S Hippe, Matthew P N Unrath, Matthew J Nyflot, Sean D Mooney, Christoph I Lee

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ojas A RamwalaDepartment of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, 98195, USA.
Kathryn P LowryDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, 98195, USA.
Daniel S HippeClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA.
Matthew P N UnrathPariveda Solutions, Seattle, Washington, 98101, USA.
Matthew J NyflotDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, 98195, USA.
Sean D MooneyCenter for Information Technology, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, USA.
Christoph I LeeDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, 98195, USA, stophlee@uw.edu.

Funding

Risk-based Imaging Strategies to Improve Breast Cancer Surveillance OutcomesP01CA154292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI KARLA M KERLIKOWSKE · 2011 to 2026
$52.9M
Artificial Intelligence for Improved Breast Cancer Screening Accuracy: External Validation, Refinement, and Clinical TranslationR37CA240403 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CHRISTOPH I LEE · 2020 to 2026
$3.8M
Population-Based Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence for Mammography Priorto Widespread Clinical TranslationR01CA262023 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CHRISTOPH I LEE · 2022 to 2026
$3.2M
Evaluation of Commercial Mammography-Based Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for Breast Cancer Risk Prediction in U.S. Screening PopulationsR37CA292399 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Kathryn Paige Lowry · 2024 to 2026
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA154292NCI NIH HHS R01 CA262023NCI NIH HHS R37 CA240403NCI NIH HHS R37 CA292399
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms showcase the potential to steer a paradigm shift in clinical medicine, especially medical imaging. Concerns associated with model generalizability and biases necessitate rigorous external validation of AI algorithms prior to their adoption into clinical workflows. To address the barriers associated with patient privacy, intellectual property, and diverse model requirements, we introduce ClinValAI, a framework for establishing robust cloud-based infrastructures to clinically validate AI algorithms in medical imaging. By featuring dedicated workflows for data ingestion, algorithm scoring, and output processing, we propose an easily customizable method to assess AI models and investigate biases. Our novel orchestration mechanism facilitates utilizing the complete potential of the cloud computing environment. ClinValAI's input auditing and standardization mechanisms ensure that inputs consistent with model prerequisites are provided to the algorithm for a streamlined validation. The scoring workflow comprises multiple steps to facilitate consistent inferencing and systematic troubleshooting. The output processing workflow helps identify and analyze samples with missing results and aggregates final outputs for downstream analysis. We demonstrate the usability of our work by evaluating a state-of-the-art breast cancer risk prediction algorithm on a large and diverse dataset of 2D screening mammograms. We perform comprehensive statistical analysis to study model calibration and evaluate performance on important factors, including breast density, age, and race, to identify latent biases. ClinValAI provides a holistic framework to validate medical imaging models and has the potential to advance the development of generalizable AI models in clinical medicine and promote health equity.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceCloud ComputingComputational BiologyDiagnostic ImagingBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMammographyValidation Studies as TopicWorkflow

Identifiers

PMID39670372
PMCPMC12240695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.