Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39670368›Full record

ArticlePacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing2025

Implications of An Evolving Regulatory Landscape on the Development of AI and ML in Medicine.

Nicole Rincon, Sara Gerke, Jennifer K Wagner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nicole RinconPenn State Law, University Park, PA 16802, USA, nar5442@psu.edu.
Sara GerkeUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign College of Law, Champaign, IL 61820, USA, gerke@illinois.edu.
Jennifer K WagnerPenn State Law, University Park, PA 16802, USA, jkw131@psu.edu.

Funding

Bioethical, Legal, and Anthropological Study of Technologies (BLAST)R21EB035474 · NIBIB · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI WAGNER, JENNIFER KRISTIN · 2023 to 2024
$441k
NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB035474
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) technologies in healthcare presents significant opportunities for enhancing patient care through innovative diagnostic tools, monitoring systems, and personalized treatment plans. However, these innovative advancements might result in regulatory challenges given recent Supreme Court decisions that impact the authority of regulatory agencies like the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This paper explores the implications of regulatory uncertainty for the healthcare industry related to balancing innovation in biotechnology and biocomputing with ensuring regulatory uniformity and patient safety. We examine key Supreme Court cases, including Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, Relentless, Inc. v. Department of Commerce, and Corner Post, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, and their impact on the Chevron doctrine. We also discuss other relevant cases to highlight shifts in judicial approaches to agency deference and regulatory authority that might affect how science is handled in regulatory spaces, including how biocomputing and other health sciences are governed, how scientific facts are applied in policymaking, and how scientific expertise guides decision making. Through a detailed analysis, we assess the potential impact of regulatory uncertainty in healthcare. Additionally, we provide recommendations for the medical community on navigating these challenges.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceComputational BiologyMachine LearningUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationBiotechnologyGovernment RegulationHumansPrecision MedicineSupreme Court DecisionsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID39670368
PMCPMC11649012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.