Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39670365›Full record

ArticlePacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing2025

A Prospective Comparison of Large Language Models for Early Prediction of Sepsis.

Supreeth P Shashikumar, Shamim Nemati

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Supreeth P ShashikumarDivision of Biomedical Informatics, University of California San Diego La Jolla, California, USA, spshashikumar@health.ucsd.edu.
Shamim NematiDivision of Biomedical Informatics, University of California San Diego La Jolla, California, USA, snemati@health.ucsd.edu.

Funding

GeneRAlizable Sepsis Phenotyping (GRASP) using Electronic Health Records and Continuous Monitoring SensorsR35GM143121 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI NEMATI, SHAMIM · 2021 to 2025
$2.2M
RAAB-AI: Reducing Automation and Anchoring Bias in AI SystemsR01LM013998 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SHAMIM NEMATI · 2022 to 2026
$1.7M
AIVIS: Next Generation Vigilant Information Seeking Artificial Intelligence-based Clinical Decision Support for SepsisR42AI177108 · NIAID · HEALCISIO, INC. · PI JOSEF, CHRISTOPHER · 2023 to 2024
$1.3M
NIAID NIH HHS R42 AI177108NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM143121NLM NIH HHS R01 LM013998
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a comparative study on the performance of two popular open-source large language models for early prediction of sepsis: Llama-3 8B and Mixtral 8x7B. The primary goal was to determine whether a smaller model could achieve comparable predictive accuracy to a significantly larger model in the context of sepsis prediction using clinical data.Our proposed LLM-based sepsis prediction system, COMPOSER-LLM, enhances the previously published COMPOSER model, which utilizes structured EHR data to generate hourly sepsis risk scores. The new system incorporates an LLM-based approach to extract sepsis-related clinical signs and symptoms from unstructured clinical notes. For scores falling within high-uncertainty prediction regions, particularly those near the decision threshold, the system uses the LLM to draw additional clinical context from patient notes; thereby enhancing the model's predictive accuracy in challenging diagnostic scenarios.A total of 2,074 patient encounters admitted to the Emergency Department at two hospitals within the University of California San Diego Health system were used for model evaluation in this study. Our findings reveal that the Llama-3 8B model based system (COMPOSER-LLMLlama) achieved a sensitivity of 70.3%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 32.5%, F-1 score of 44.4% and false alarms per patient hour (FAPH) of 0.0194, closely matching the performance of the larger Mixtral 8x7B model based system (COMPOSER-LLMmixtral) which achieved a sensitivity of 72.1%, PPV of 31.9%, F-1 score of 44.2% and FAPH of 0.020. When prospectively evaluated, COMPOSER-LLMLlama demonstrated similar performance to the COMPOSER-LLMmixtral pipeline, with a sensitivity of 68.7%, PPV of 36.6%, F-1 score of 47.7% and FAPH of 0.019 vs. sensitivity of 70.5%, PPV of 36.3%, F-1 score of 47.9% and FAPH of 0.020. This result indicates that, for extraction of clinical signs and symptoms from unstructured clinical notes to enable early prediction of sepsis, the Llama-3 generation of smaller language models can perform as effectively and more efficiently than larger models. This finding has significant implications for healthcare settings with limited resources.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyElectronic Health RecordsSepsisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, StatisticalProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID39670365
PMCPMC11649013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.