ArticleFrontiers in plant science2024
Bibliometric and meta-analysis on the publication status, research trends and impact inducing factors of JA-SA interactions in plants.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interactions between jasmonic acid (JA) and salicylic acid (SA) pathways in plants are important for regulating metabolite production and resistance functions against environmental stresses. These interactions in plants have mostly been reported to be antagonistic, but also to be synergistic under specific external inducing conditions. At present, publications on plant JA-SA interactions lack a bibliometric analysis. External inducing factors that elicit synergism of JA-SA interactions need to be explored. Here, we use bibliometrics to analyze publications on plant JA-SA interactions over the past three decades, and analyze external inducing factors that influence the quality of JA-SA interactions in plants by meta-analysis. More contributions have been made by authors in China, Netherlands, the United States of America, and Germany than elsewhere. Considerable research has been performed on variation in plant defense mediated by two pathways, the transduction mechanisms of JA-SA signaling crosstalk, and plant hormone signaling networks. Meta-analysis showed that the excitation sequence of the two pathways, and the concentrations of pathway excitors are key factors that affect pathways interactions. The JA and SA pathways tend to be reciprocally antagonistic when elicited simultaneously, whereas JA-SA interactions tend to be synergistic when the two pathways are elicited at different times and the pre-treated inducer is at a lower concentration. The SA pathway is more susceptible to being synergized by the JA pathway. Key molecular nodes identified in the JA-SA signaling interaction in model plants, and prospects for future research are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.