Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39670243›Full record

ArticleArchives of academic emergency medicine2025

Awareness of Emergency Department Workforce about the Operational Metrics: A Cross-sectional Study.

Khalid Nabeel Almulhim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of academic emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Khalid Nabeel AlmulhimCollege of Medicine, King Faisal University, Hofuf, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The awareness of the Emergency Department (ED) workforce about the department's operational guidelines and metrics is essential to optimize the workflow and reduce workload and patient revisits to the ED. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the knowledge of the ED workforce regarding operational metrics. Methods: We conducted a national cross-sectional study using an online survey in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia between September and December 2020. ED personnel were studied regarding the ED operational metrics like laboratory/imaging turnaround times, ED length of stay, and patient revisits, linking them to quality care. Data was summarized and analyzed using the Jamovi statistical package. Results: One hundred sixty-six participants responded to our online survey. Ministry of Health hospitals represented the largest section (n=90, 54.2%), followed by academic hospitals (n=40, 24.1%). The frequencies of an exit block in the ED were reported as 2-3 days per week (29.5%), most days (24.7%), or daily (18.1%). 41% of the respondents did not know the metrics of lab and imaging turnaround time, while 21.7% did not know about the length of stay. Most respondents agreed that the principles of ED operation should be implemented in the training programs (88.6%) and reported their satisfaction with the productivity of their department in practicing effective operations (70.9%). Conclusion: About one-third of the ED workers were unaware of the key operational metrics of the ED. However, the respondents believe that implementing operational metrics for ED increases the quality of medical care and should be part of the training programs.

Indexed as

Cross-sectional studyEmergency MedicinephysiciansSaudi ArabiaSurvey

Identifiers

PMID39670243
PMCPMC11635531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.