Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39670228›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Improvement of the Gaussian mixture models' unsupervised learning method through the inclusion of dynamical systems for various types of nonlinear data.

Rahim Mahjoub

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Rahim MahjoubDepartment of Labor and Technology Education, Farhangian University, Qazvin, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gaussian mixture models (GMM) with a modulating dynamical system (DS) approach is an unsupervised learning method, and it can estimate the distribution of given data or encoding trajectories in the input space. In this paper, a series of trajectories is considered for simulation, and the role of tuning parameters in the algorithm for both Gaussian function encoding and behavior of the dynamical system is obtained and compared. This algorithm divides the input space of the data into presupposed local regions and then in each local region of the data employs a dynamical system approach for tracking the major trajectories of the data. In this paper, the influence of the number of the Gaussian function in the GMM approach is investigated and simulated deeply. Furthermore, the influence of the local statistical characteristic of data such as mean or covariance of the data on the training process is discussed, and in these conditions, the effect of tuning parameters as the number of the Gaussian function is explained. Also, all details of the characteristic of DS depend on these tuning parameters, especially when data has more variance or noise, this adjustment should be checked more accurately. So, eventually, we showed in the obtained simulation results that the behavior and location of attractor points in DS on the data distributions and accordingly stability of the DS is getting improved drastically by tuning the number of Gaussian functions accurately.

Indexed as

Dynamical systemEM algorithmGMM approachNonlinear trajectoriesPoint-to-point motions

Identifiers

PMID39670228
PMCPMC11637209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.