ArticleJournal of chiropractic medicine2024
Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity of the Persian Version of the Neck Outcome Score Questionnaire in Iranian Patients With Nonspecific Neck Pain.
Article in Journal of chiropractic medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The primary purpose of this study was to translate and culturally adapt the neck outcome score (NOOS) questionnaire into Persian language and investigate its reliability and validity. Methods: The NOOS questionnaire was translated into Persian language and culturally adapted according to American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons guidelines. One hundred four patients with nonspecific neck pain were requested to complete the Persian version of the NOOS questionnaire, 36-item short form survey (SF-36), and neck disability index (NDI) questionnaire. The 95 patients of them were requested to fulfill the Persian version of NOOS again, with 3 to 5 days interval. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability were assessed using Cronbach's α and intraclass correlation coefficient, respectively. The construct validity was assessed by testing the hypothesis of correlations between NOOS subscales, SF-36 subscales, and NDI, and pain was measured using visual analog scale. Results: One hundred four patients with nonspecific neck pain participated in validity studies and 95 patients agreed to participate in reliability studies. Floor/ceiling effects were not observed. Cronbach's α values of the subscale ranged between 0.60 and 0.89. The intraclass correlation coefficient measures of the NOOS subscales ranging between 0.81 and 0.95. The correlation coefficient between NOOS subscales and SF-36 subscales ranged between 0.11 and 0.72. The correlation coefficient between NOOS subscale scores and NDI questionnaire ranged between 0.33 and 0.61. The correlation coefficient between NOOS subscale scores, and pain (visual analog scale) ranged between 0.31 and 0.66. Conclusion: This study showed that the Persian version of the NOOS questionnaire was a reliable and valid instrument to assess patients' perception of their neck-related problems in Iranian patients with nonspecific neck pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.