ReviewJournal of tissue engineering
Bioinspired synthetic peptide-based biomaterials regenerate bone through biomimicking of extracellular matrix.
Review in Journal of tissue engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Marine Algae Hydrogels as Emerging Biomaterials for Medicine.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Mechanism-Guided Nanoengineered Therapeutic Peptides for Bone Healing.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Multifunctional Biomaterial Strategies to Regulate Inflammation and Promote Kidney Repair.Biomaterials research · 2026Article
- Self-assembling peptide nanofibers as growth factor-mimicking scaffolds enhancing the bone regeneration potential of nanoceramics: a triad ofRSC advances · 2025Article
- Functionalized mesenchymal stem cells for enhanced bone regeneration: advances and challenges.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Review
- Formation of 3D Human Osteoblast Spheroids Incorporating Extracellular Matrix-Mimetic Phage Peptides as a Surrogate Bone Tissue Model.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Advanced therapeutic scaffolds of biomimetic periosteum for functional bone regeneration.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
- Advancements in Regenerative Therapies for Orthopedics: A Comprehensive Review of Platelet-Rich Plasma, Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Peptide Therapies, and Biomimetic Applications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Application of Antimicrobial Peptides (AMPs) in Treatment of Osteomyelitis in Human and Veterinary Orthopedics.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- CGRP-dependent molecular signaling drives bone marrow stem cell osteogenesis in distraction osteogenesis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There have been remarkable advancements in regenerative medicine for bone regeneration, tackling the worldwide health concern of tissue loss. Tissue engineering uses the body's natural capabilities and applies biomaterials and bioactive molecules to replace damaged or lost tissues and restore their functionality. While synthetic ceramics have overcome some challenges associated with allografts and xenografts, they still need essential growth factors and biomolecules. Combining ceramics and bioactive molecules, such as peptides derived from biological motifs of vital proteins, is the most effective approach to achieve optimal bone regeneration. These bioactive peptides induce various cellular processes and modify scaffold properties by mimicking the function of natural osteogenic, angiogenic and antibacterial biomolecules. The present review aims to consolidate the latest and most pertinent information on the advancements in bioactive peptides, including angiogenic, osteogenic, antimicrobial, and self-assembling peptide nanofibers for bone tissue regeneration, elucidating their biological effects and potential clinical implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.