Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39670146›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2024

Acceptability and exploratory effects of an occupational therapy intervention to improve recovery and return to work of workers with mental health disorders in primary care: a mixed methods study protocol.

Justine Labourot, Quan Nha Hong, Catherine Briand, Cynthia Cameron, Marie-José Durand, Nadia Giguère, Élyse Marois, Matthew Menear, Marielle Trottier, Helen-Maria Vasiliadis and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Justine LabourotÉcole de réadaptation, Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Quan Nha HongÉcole de réadaptation, Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Catherine BriandCentre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Cynthia CameronDepartment of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada.
Marie-José DurandÉcole de Réadaptation, Faculté de Médecine et des Sciences de la Santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Nadia GiguèreDepartment of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Élyse MaroisÉcole de réadaptation, Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Matthew MenearDepartment of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada.
Marielle TrottierUniversity of Montreal Hospital Centre (CRCHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada.
Helen-Maria VasiliadisDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Brigitte VachonÉcole de réadaptation, Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: People with common mental disorders (CMD) are prone to experience work disabilities, which can lead to sick leave. To support their recovery and return to work, evidence recommends providing a combination of primary care services including psychological and work rehabilitation interventions. Furthermore, interventions to coordinate return to work are required to ensure timely access to services and concerted action among stakeholders. Occupational therapists are qualified to provide these interventions and to facilitate sick leave management. However, current medical practices, lack of collaboration among stakeholders, and lack of occupational therapists working within family medicine groups create highly variable care pathways and delays in access to appropriate services. Aim: This study aims to evaluate the acceptability and explore the effects of an occupational therapist-led program integrated within family medicine groups designed to improve the management of CMD-related sick leave and promote patients' recovery and sustainable return to work in the Canadian province of Québec. Methods: This study will consist of a mixed methods multiple case study design. It will also use a participatory research approach, actively engaging family medicine group team members and patient partners throughout the study. The occupational therapy program will include three components: 1) consultation for prevention of sick leave and support for return-to-work decisions, 2) coordination of recovery and return-to-work services, and 3) provision of recovery and work rehabilitation services adapted to each patient's needs. Questionnaires, interviews, and focus groups will be used to collect data on the eight dimensions of the acceptability model described by Sekhon et al. and to measure pre- and post-outcomes to assess the effects of the occupational therapy program. Data will be analyzed using the Framework Method and repeated measures statistical analysis. Discussion: We expect that the provision of this innovative occupational therapy program will improve patients' outcomes and the service trajectory of people with CMD. This study will document how to enhance interprofessional collaboration within family medicine groups and to ensure equitable access to work rehabilitation services for all patients, thereby improving recovery and healthy sustainable return-to-work.

Indexed as

acceptabilitycommon mental disordersimplementationoccupational therapyprimary carereturn to work coordination

Identifiers

PMID39670146
PMCPMC11635104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.