Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39670105›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2024

Accuracy of augmented reality navigated surgery for placement of zygomatic implants: a human cadaver study.

Sander Tabernée Heijtmeijer, Haye Glas, Nard Janssen, Nathalie Vosselman, Sebastiaan de Visscher, Fred Spijkervet, Gerry Raghoebar, Remco de Bree, Antoine Rosenberg, Max Witjes and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sander Tabernée HeijtmeijerDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9566-5133
Haye GlasDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Nard JanssenDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery & Special Dental Care, Utrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Nathalie VosselmanDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Sebastiaan de VisscherDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Fred SpijkervetDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Gerry RaghoebarDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Remco de BreeDepartment of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7128-5814
Antoine RosenbergDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery & Special Dental Care, Utrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Max WitjesDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Joep KraeimaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Placement of zygomatic implants in the most optimal prosthetic position is considered challenging due to limited bone mass of the zygoma, limited visibility, length of the drilling path and proximity to critical anatomical structures. Augmented reality (AR) navigation can eliminate some of the disadvantages of surgical guides and conventional surgical navigation, while potentially improving accuracy. In this human cadaver study, we evaluated a developed AR navigation approach for placement of zygomatic implants after total maxillectomy. Methods: The developed AR navigation interface connects a commercial navigation system with the Microsoft HoloLens. AR navigated surgery was performed to place 20 zygomatic implants using five human cadaver skulls after total maxillectomy. To determine accuracy, postoperative scans were virtually matched with preoperative three-dimensional virtual surgical planning, and distances in mm from entry-exit points and angular deviations were calculated as outcome measures. Results were compared with a previously conducted study in which zygomatic implants were positioned with 3D printed surgical guides. Results: The mean entry point deviation was 2.43 ± 1.33 mm and a 3D angle deviation of 5.80 ± 4.12° (range 1.39-19.16°). The mean exit point deviation was 3.28 mm (±2.17). The abutment height deviation was on average 2.20 ± 1.35 mm. The accuracy of the abutment in the occlusal plane was 4.13 ± 2.53 mm. Surgical guides perform significantly better for the entry-point ( Conclusion: Despite the higher precision of surgical guides, AR navigation demonstrated acceptable accuracy, with potential for improvement and specialized applications. The study highlights the feasibility of AR navigation for zygomatic implant placement, offering an alternative to conventional methods.

Indexed as

Augmented RealityCadaverSurgery, Computer-AssistedZygomaHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaxillaPrinting, Three-Dimensional3D virtual surgical planningAccuracyAugmented realityGuided surgeryNavigationZygomatic implants

Identifiers

PMID39670105
PMCPMC11636531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.