ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2024
Optimizing pterygoid implant placement without sinus intrusion in edentulous vietnamese patients: A comprehensive tomographic analysis and cross-sectional study.
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intraoperative Displacement of a Pterygoid Implant into the Pterygopalatine Fossa and Its Surgical Retrieval: A Case Report.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- A Segmentation-Assisted Three-Dimensional Planning Workflow for Static-Guided Pterygoid Implant Placement: A Proof-of-Concept Report.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Severe maxillary resorption presents challenges in dental implant placement. This research aims to assess the feasibility, angular orientation, and appropriate length of pterygoid implants in patients with significant maxillary atrophy. Material and Methods: The study examined Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) scans from 60 completely edentulous patients classified as Cawood and Howell's Classes V or VI, with less than 4mm residual bone height in their posterior maxilla. Experienced oral and maxillofacial surgeons and researchers conducted virtual pterygoid implant placement, evaluating various implant positions. Results: Position C was the most frequent, comprising 34.6% of cases evaluated. The average antero-posterior angle across all positions was 51.82±5.57 degrees, and the bucco-lingual angle was 74.15±16.53 degrees relative to the Frankfort horizontal plane. The optimal location for implant neck placement was approximately 10 mm from the most distal point of maxillary tuberosity, angled 50 degrees antero-posteriorly and 75 degrees bucco-lingually. While 18 mm implants were typically used, lengths of 20-22 mm were sometimes necessary for bicortical anchorage. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the viability of pterygoid implants even in cases of significant maxillary atrophy. The findings emphasize the importance of adapting implant placement strategies to individual patient anatomies. Further research may be needed to refine techniques for patients with severe maxillary resorption.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.