ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2024
Prevalence of mandibular, condylar and ramus asymmetry in panoramic radiographs of adult individuals. A cross-sectional study.
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mandibular asymmetry is more common than previously thought. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of mandibular, condylar and ramus asymmetry by means of the Habets index using panoramic radiographs obtained from adult individuals. Material and Methods: This cross-sectional study evaluated 210 panoramic radiographs performed in adults attending a private referral radiology center in Lima, Peru. Radiographs of both genders were considered, including permanent dentition and of good quality. A trained and calibrated evaluator assessed mandibular, condyle and ramus height using the Habets method, considering asymmetry when the difference between the two sides was greater than 3%. Fisher's exact test, the paired Student's t-test and finally binary logistic regression were used to determine the characteristics of the asymmetries. Results: Mandibular asymmetry was present in 39.5%, condylar asymmetry in 81.4% and mandibular ramus asymmetry in 48.6%, with no differences between genders ( Conclusions: The prevalence of mandibular, condylar and ramus asymmetries in the sample evaluated was significant, although most of these asymmetries can be considered mild, given that the highly sensitive Habets index classifies any difference greater than 3% as asymmetry. These asymmetries, although most of them could be clinically not very noticeable, should be considered when planning treatments. In addition, neither gender nor age was found to significantly influence the occurrence of these asymmetries.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.