ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2024
Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of resectable central non-small cell lung cancer patients undergoing sleeve lobectomy: a large-scale, single-center, real-world study.
Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Outcomes of carinal sleeve resection versus primary suturing in post-pneumonectomy bronchopleural fistula.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Semi-Continuous Versus Continuous Suturing Techniques in Bronchial Anastomosis Following da Vinci Robotic-Assisted Sleeve Lobectomy.Thoracic cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In the treatment of central-type non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), sleeve lobectomy (SL) has emerged as the surgical treatment of choice over pneumonectomy (PN). This retrospective study evaluates the clinical profiles and prognostic elements impacting survival and recurrence rates in patients who underwent SL. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 288 patients who underwent SL from January 2010 to December 2023. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and survival curves were subsequently drawn. Factors predicting SL outcomes were investigated through univariate and multivariable Cox regression analyses. Results: Univariate and multivariable analyses consistently demonstrated significant variations in overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) among subgroups receiving neoadjuvant therapy (NT), which also stood out as independent prognostic factors. Patients undergoing NT showed enhanced OS [hazard ratio (HR) =0.4652, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.3042-0.7116, P=0.004] and DFS (HR =0.5182, 95% CI: 0.3243-0.8279, P=0.01). Earlier pT stages were associated with better prognosis (P<0.05). Significant differences in both OS and DFS were noted across pN stages, with earlier stages indicating improved prognosis; this was a significant independent factor for DFS (P<0.001). Similar significant trends were observed across pathological Tumor-Node-Metastasis (pTNM) stages, with earlier stages linked to better outcomes. Additionally, body mass index (BMI) was identified as an independent prognostic factor for both OS and DFS. Clinical T stage independently influenced DFS. No significant prognostic disparities were observed in other clinical characteristics (P>0.05). Conclusions: NT significantly improves the prognosis for NSCLC patients undergoing SL. Pathological staging is proven to be more indicative of prognosis than clinical staging. Understanding the staging of lymph nodes (LNs) is crucial for predicting the long-term recurrence risk in patients with NSCLC who undergo SL treatment. Mediastinal and hilar LN dissection is especially important in minimizing this risk and improving prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.