ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2024
Evaluation of the ASPYRE-Lung targeted variant panel: a rapid, low-input solution for non-small cell lung cancer biomarker testing and experience from three independent sites.
Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Successful simplified genomic profiling of cytology specimens using Aspyre Clinical Test for Lung (Tissue).Cancer cytopathology · 2026Article
- Sequential versus massively parallel strategies for molecular characterization of non-small cell lung cancer samples obtained by endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Many patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) lack access to highly effective approved targeted therapeutics due to multiple gaps in biomarker testing. Challenges in comprehensive molecular testing include complexities associated with the need to assess the presence of multiple variants, costs of running multiple sequential assays per sample, high assay quality control (QC) failure rates, clinical need for rapid turn-around time (TAT) to initiate therapy, and insufficient tissue samples. The ASPYRE-Lung NSCLC assay addresses gaps in multiplexed testing by simultaneously analyzing DNA and RNA, detecting 114 actionable genomic variants across 11 genes, consistent with current NSCLC treatment guidelines. This study was to assess the ease of adoption and performance of ASPYRE-Lung in third-party laboratories, comparing concordance across sites and with orthogonal methods. Methods: ASPYRE-Lung was established at two academic centers with multiple operators per site. Assay concordance was evaluated across three sites using 77 patient samples [61 derived from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue and 16 from cytology specimens]. Results: Reproducibility for all 77 samples yielded a positive percent agreement (PPA) of 100% and negative percent agreement (NPA) of 99.99%. Concordance with next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based methods across all three sites was high with PPA of 97.2% and NPA of 99.96%. Conclusions: ASPYRE-Lung assay is a cost-effective, easy to adopt testing method requiring no specialized expertise or complicated bioinformatics, with the potential to inform genomic data on small tissue samples, thus enabling all patients with NSCLC to undergo biomarker testing in a timely manner and benefit from appropriate targeted therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.