Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39669990›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2024

The past, present, and future of endoscopic management for biliary strictures: technological innovations and stent advancements.

Dong-Jin Ni, Qi-Fan Yang, Lu Nie, Jian Xu, Si-Zhe He, Jun Yao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dong-Jin NiDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated People's Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China.
Qi-Fan YangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated People's Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China.
Lu NieDepartment of Intervention Vascular, Wujin Hospital Affiliated with Jiangsu University, Changzhou, China.
Jian XuDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated People's Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China.
Si-Zhe HeShanghai Academy of Fine Arts, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.
Jun YaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated People's Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biliary stricture can be induced by intrinsic narrowing and extrinsic compression, with the majority of cases being malignant. Clinically, distinguishing between benign and malignant biliary strictures remains a considerable challenge, and the ongoing disagreement over the optimal choice of biliary stents significantly influences treatment strategies and impacts patients' survival and prognosis. The utilization and advancement of endoscopic techniques have heightened the diagnostic sensitivity for biliary strictures. Concurrently, innovative technologies such as endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic compression anastomosis emerge as viable alternatives when endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is not an option, providing fresh insights for the clinical management of these patients. Traditional plastic and metal stents, characterized by their complex application and limited scope, have been unable to fully satisfy clinical needs. The introduction of novel stent varieties has notably improved this scenario, marking a considerable progression towards precision medicine. However, the clinical validation of the diverse stent materials available is incomplete. Hence, a thorough discussion on the present state and evolving trends of biliary stents is warranted.

Indexed as

biliary stentsbiliary stricturebiodegradable materialsendoscopic treatmentprecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID39669990
PMCPMC11634603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.