ArticleMethodsX2024
Performance of machine learning models to forecast PM10 levels.
Article in MethodsX, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A novel nowcasting (estimation) model based on an adaptive network neutrosophic hesitant fuzzy inference system (ANNHFIS): a case study of Istanbul.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence to predict soil temperatures by development of novel model.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Machine learning techniques have garnered considerable attention in modern technologies due to their promising outcomes across various domains. This paper presents the comprehensive methodology of an optimized and efficient forecasting approach for Particulate Matter 10, specifically tailored to predefined locations. The execution of a comparative analysis involving eight models enables the identification of the most suitable model that aligns with the primary research objective. Notably, the test results underscore the superior performance of an ensemble model, which integrates state-of-the-art methodologies, surpassing the performance of the other seven state-of-the-art models. Adopting a case-specific methodology with machine learning techniques contributes to achieving a notably high regression coefficient (R²≈1) across all models. Furthermore, the study underscores the potential for future endeavors in predicting location-specific environmental factors.•This study focused on forecasting PM10 with machine learning models with the consideration of air quality factors and meteorological factors•Ensemble model was developed for the forecasting purposes with higher performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.