ArticleJournal of arrhythmia2024
Predictors of long-term success after high-density mapping-guided substrate ablation procedures for ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.
Article in Journal of arrhythmia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Intrapericardial Fluid on Lesion Size During Epicardial Radiofrequency Ablation: A Computational Study.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Article
- Early vs. deferred catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in patients of ischaemic substrate: systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes.European heart journal open · 2025Article
- Predictors of long-term success after high-density mapping-guided substrate ablation procedures for ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.Journal of arrhythmia · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: High-density (HD) substrate mapping may increase success of catheter ablation targeting ventricular tachycardia (VT). However, despite its use, recurrent VT is not uncommon. We aim to investigate factors that are associated with outcomes after HD mapping-guided substrate ablation procedures for VT in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Methods: Observational cohort study includes patients with ischemic heart disease who underwent HD mapping-guided substrate ablation of VT. Baseline and procedural characteristics were associated with outcomes after VT ablation. Results: VT ablation employing HD mapping was performed in 80 patients. Median follow-up was 2.3 years. VT-free survival at one, two, and five years were 65%, 49%, and 40%. One-, two-, and five-year implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) shock-free survival rates were 90%, 81%, and 70%. Complications occurred in 3 patients (3.8%, 1 vascular, 2 tamponades). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and 45 W (vs. 35 W) ablation power were associated with VT-free survival. High ablation power was also associated with shock-free survival. All-cause mortality during follow-up was associated with higher age, the presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), LVEF, and urgent ablation. Conclusions: In patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy that had HD substrate mapping-guided VT ablation, ablation power was associated with both VT-free and shock-free survival, underlining the importance of effective target elimination. All-cause mortality during follow-up was associated with several factors (age, COPD, LVEF, and urgent vs. elective ablation), which could be used to guide patient selection for VT ablation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.