ArticleJournal of arrhythmia2024
Use of ivabradine in children with junctional ectopic tachycardia after pediatric cardiac surgery; two-centre experience.
Article in Journal of arrhythmia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Potential use of ivabradine in postoperative junctional ectopic tachycardia: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Pooled it
- A scoping review of the evidence supporting antiarrhythmic use after paediatric cardiac surgery.Cardiology in the young · 2026Review
- Effects of sacubitril/valsartan combined with ivabradine in treating cardiorenal syndrome.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Clinical implication of ivabradine-incorporated medical therapy for junctional ectopic tachycardia following pediatric cardiac surgery.Journal of arrhythmia · 2025Article
- Use of ivabradine in children with junctional ectopic tachycardia after pediatric cardiac surgery; two-centre experience.Journal of arrhythmia · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Although amiodarone is traditionally used in the treatment of postoperative junctional ectopic tachycardia (JET), the search for new treatments is ongoing. We present our experience with ivabradine at two medical centers. Materials and Methods: Between January 2022 and January 2023, patients who developed JET after pediatric cardiac surgery were prospectively followed up and documented. The diagnosis of JET was made with the support of the electrophysiology team and treatment was based primarily on whether JET disrupted hemodynamics. Results: This study was conducted at two high-volume centers, which record a total of 1130 pediatric cardiac surgeries within a year. The study recruited 26 patients with median heart rate 180 beats per minute, and 10 (38%) patients had impaired hemodynamics. Out of the 26 study participants, 14 (54%) cases were treated with ivabradine alone, 10 (38%) cases were treated with amiodarone + ivabradine, and 2 patients (8%) with high heart rates and prolonged junctional arrhythmia were treated with ivabradine and flecainide. The median time to ventricular rate control was 12 h, and the median time to sinus rhythm conversion was 55.5 h. No ivabradine-related side effects were observed in any of the patients, and no patient experienced JET recurrence after discontinuing treatment. Conclusion: Ivabradine seems to be a safe and effective medical treatment that can be used as the primary treatment in patients with stable hemodynamics, as an adjunctive therapy to amiodarone in patients with impaired hemodynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.