ArticleJournal of arrhythmia2024
Investigating the role of electroanatomical mapping in single-shot pulsed field catheter ablation.
Article in Journal of arrhythmia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pulsed field ablation for the interventional treatment of atrial fibrillation: a scientific statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society, and the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026Guideline
- Pulsed Field Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Japan: Current Status and Future Perspectives.Circulation reports · 2026Review
- Left atrial appendage closure: Current status, unresolved issues, and future perspectives.Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics · 2026Review
- Novel Impedance-Guided Contact Mapping Technique for the Circular Multielectrode Pulsed-Field Ablation Catheter.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Editorial to "investigating the role of electroanatomical mapping in single-shot pulsed field catheter ablation".Journal of arrhythmia · 2024Article
- Investigating the role of electroanatomical mapping in single-shot pulsed field catheter ablation.Journal of arrhythmia · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a form of nonthermal energy that has been recently introduced for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). A multi-electrode pentaspline catheter for delivery of PFA guided by fluoroscopy has become widely available for clinical use. Methods and Results: In this study, we aimed to assess whether the addition of electroanatomical mapping (EAM) for confirmation of PVI in the acute phase can increase the efficacy of the procedure in terms of arrhythmia recurrences. A total of 51 patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) scheduled for first time PVI were included in the study. Participants were assigned to receive PVI using fluoroscopy guidance only (Fluoro-only group: 31 patients) or additional validation with EAM (EAM group: 20 patients). Endpoints included arrhythmia recurrence and procedural characteristics. During a 11.2 ± 1.3 months follow-up period, arrhythmia recurrences did not statistically differ between groups (16.1% vs. 20%, Conclusion: In a cohort of patients with AF undergoing first time PVI using a pentaspline PFA catheter, PVI validation with EAM did not lead to significantly different arrhythmia recurrence rates compared to PVI without EAM. In the acute phase, the rate of nonisolated PVs was low.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.