ArticleCureus2024
Evaluating the Impact of Adjustable- and Fixed-Loop Femoral Endobuttons on Intraoperative Surgeon Satisfaction and Postoperative Patient Functional Outcomes in Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Correlation between gait analysis parameters and joint function prognosis during rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a retrospective study.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis study aims to evaluate the effects of adjustable- and fixed-loop femoral endobuttons on intraoperative surgeon satisfaction and postoperative patient functional outcomes in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The use of cortical suspensory devices, either fixed-loop or adjustable-loop, is common in ACL reconstruction surgeries for femoral tunnel fixation. Fixed-loop devices, although effective, often require additional tunnel drilling, potentially leading to tunnel widening. Adjustable-loop devices were introduced to mitigate this issue. However, there are concerns regarding the mechanical performance of adjustable loops, particularly under cyclical loading, which could affect long-term graft stability. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective comparative study compares functional outcomes and intraoperative assessments of 140 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction between 2017 and 2021 with fixed-loop and adjustable-loop devices for the femoral side. Patients were evaluated at six weeks, six months, one year, and two years postoperatively using the Lysholm score, International Knee Document Committee score, Tegner activity scores, and knee stability tests, including Lachman and anterior drawer tests. Additionally, the study captured surgeon satisfaction intraoperatively and compared it with the final functional outcome.
resultsBoth groups demonstrated significant improvements in knee stability, range of motion (ROM), and functional scores over time. At six weeks, the anterior drawer test showed 61 stable knees out of 70 in the adjustable-loop group and 57 of 70 in the fixed-loop group, with stability maintained in 56 and 49 knees, respectively, at the final follow-up. The mean extension at two years was 0.5° ± 3.8° in the fixed-loop group and -1.3° ± 3.2° in the adjustable-loop group (p = 0.02). Although the adjustable-loop group showed trends toward better early knee stability and extension, these differences were not statistically significant at two years (p > 0.05).
conclusionSurgeons' intraoperative satisfaction with graft firmness was higher in the adjustable-loop group. However, this did not correlate with long-term functional outcomes, as both groups had comparable scores at the final follow-up. Further research with larger sample sizes and extended follow-up periods is needed to confirm these findings. The limitations of this study include its retrospective design, the potential for selection bias, and the subjective nature of intraoperative assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.