ArticleCureus2024
Successful Direct Current Cardioversion (DCCV) in Pregnancy in a Non-Obstetric Emergency Department.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unravelling Sex Disparities in the Pathophysiology of Atrial Fibrillation: Review of the Current Evidence.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2025Review
- The Pathophysiology of Sex Differences in Stroke Risk and Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: A Comprehensive Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is uncommon in pregnancy but associated with significant mortality. Although controlled studies evaluating therapeutic management of AF in pregnancy are lacking, current guidelines suggest that direct current cardioversion (DCCV) is safe in cases of maternal arrhythmia with hemodynamic compromise. In this report, we discuss a female patient of 22 weeks gestation who presented to the non-obstetric Emergency Department (ED) with acute onset, symptomatic AF. Following consultation with emergency medicine, cardiology, and maternal-fetal medicine specialists, rhythm control was favored for immediate management. A single 200 joules synchronized shock resulted in a successful reversion to sinus rhythm with no adverse events using agreed procedural sedation protocols. The patient had an uneventful inpatient course and was later discharged with outpatient cardiology and obstetric follow-up. This case contributes to the evidence that DCCV is safe in pregnant patients and proposes that standard medications used for analgesia and sedation in cardioversion are safe in pregnancy. A multidisciplinary team approach is key in managing AF in pregnancy in the acute non-obstetric setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.