ReviewCureus2024
The Rapidly Evolving Scenario of Acoustic Voice Analysis in Otolaryngology.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A machine learning-derived speech index as a biomarker for Huntington's disease severity.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Voice Disorders: Current Landscape, Emerging Applications and Future Directions.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The field of voice analysis has experienced significant transformations, evolving from basic perceptual assessments to the incorporation of advanced digital signal processing and computational tools. This progression has facilitated a deeper understanding of the complex dynamics of vocal function, particularly through the use of acoustic voice analysis within a multidimensional evaluation framework. Traditionally, voice analysis relied on parameters such as fundamental frequency, jitter, shimmer, and noise-to-harmonic ratio, which, despite their utility, have faced criticism for variability and lack of robustness. Recent developments have led to a shift toward more reliable metrics such as cepstral measures, which offer improved accuracy in voice quality assessments. Furthermore, the integration of multiparametric constructs underscores a comprehensive approach to evaluating vocal quality, blending sustained vowels, and continuous speech analyses. Current trends in clinical practice increasingly favor these advanced measures over traditional parameters due to their greater reliability and clinical utility. Additionally, the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly deep learning, holds promise for revolutionizing voice analysis by enhancing diagnostic precision and enabling efficient, non-invasive screening methods. This shift toward AI-driven approaches signifies a potential paradigm change in voice health, suggesting a future where AI not only aids in diagnosis but also the early detection and treatment of voice-related pathologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.