ArticleJournal of hand and microsurgery2024
Using machine learning to identify risk factors for short-term complications following thumb carpometacarpal arthroplasty.
Article in Journal of hand and microsurgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Arthroplasty: A Comprehensive Structured Critical Review and Descriptive Evidence Map of Validation, Uncertainty, and Workflow Integration.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Integrating artificial intelligence into orthopedics: Opportunities, challenges, and future directions.Journal of hand and microsurgery · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint osteoarthritis is among the most common degenerative hand diseases. Thumb CMC arthroplasty, or trapeziectomy with or without tendon augmentation, is the most frequently performed surgical treatment and has a strong safety profile. Though adverse outcomes are infrequent, the ability to predict risk for complications has substantial clinical benefits. In the present study, we evaluated a well-known surgical database with machine learning (ML) techniques to predict short-term complications and reoperations after thumb CMC arthroplasty. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted using data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) years 2005-2020. Outcomes were 30-day wound and medical complications and 30-day return to the operating room. We used three ML algorithms - a Random Forest (RF), Elastic-Net Regression (ENet), and Extreme Gradient Boosted Tree (XGBoost), and a deep learning Neural Network (NN). Feature importance analysis was performed in the highest performing model for each outcome to identify predictors with the greatest contributions. Results: We included a total of 7711 cases. The RF was the best performing algorithm for all outcomes, with an AUC score of 0.61±0.03 for reoperations, 0.55±0.04 for medical complications, and 0.59±0.03 for wound complications. On feature importance analysis, procedure duration was the highest weighted predictor for reoperations. In all outcomes, procedure duration, older age, and female sex were consistently among the top five predictors. Conclusions: We successfully developed ML algorithms to predict reoperations, wound complications, and medical complications. RF models had the highest performance in all outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.