Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39669731›Full record

ReviewJournal of hand and microsurgery2024

Low-caliber gunshot wounds in the hand a report of three cases.

Pearce Lane, Melissa Robinson, Ronit Wollstein

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of hand and microsurgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pearce LaneDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Melissa RobinsonDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Ronit WollsteinDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Low-caliber gunshot wounds (GSW) to the hand are common and their incidence is increasing. Most low-caliber GSW's are treated in the emergency department (ED) with washout, intravenous antibiotics and any further follow-up treatment usually performed in an outpatient capacity. Treatment of these injuries specifically to the hand may be controversial in terms of timing and extent of washout, debridement, and fixation. Currently, the literature lacks a concise treatment algorithm, and this report aims to provide clinical scenarios that may educate management decision-making for patients with these injuries. Methods: We discuss three cases that failed this initial treatment presenting as an infected nonunion. Each patient underwent irrigation, stabilization, and received antibiotics, yet showed no evidence of interval healing at follow-up. One of the patients demonstrated evidence of infection only one week following the injury. Results: Cultures were positive in all cases and a surgery for debridement, fixation as well as antibiotic treatment was necessary. Only one patient followed up as recommended by the treating surgeon, yet two of three of the patients demonstrated clinical improvement after surgical intervention. Conclusions: Despite being low caliber, this type of GSW to the hand likely causes more damage than to a larger part of the upper or lower extremity given the proximity of vital anatomic structures in the hand. We suggest considering a more aggressive initial treatment in the emergency room, especially for fracture patterns that could otherwise be treated non-operatively and in a particularly nonadherent population.

Indexed as

Emergency departmentGunshot woundHandLow caliberTreatment

Identifiers

PMID39669731
PMCPMC11632693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.