Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39669670›Full record

ArticleTobacco use insights2024

Patient reactions to proactive tobacco cessation counseling using a decision aid in primary care: A qualitative study.

Anne Boesch, Marie-Anne Durand, Ines Habfast-Robertson, Isabelle Jacot-Sadowski, Ivan Berlin, Kevin Selby

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco use insights, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anne BoeschUniversity Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
Marie-Anne DurandUniversity Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
Ines Habfast-RobertsonUniversity Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
Isabelle Jacot-SadowskiUniversity Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
Ivan BerlinHôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière-Sorbonne Université, Département de pharmacologie médicale, Paris, France.
Kevin SelbyUniversity Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9096-0720

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medications for smoking cessation can double quit rates but are underused in primary care. This qualitative study aimed to explore: (1) patients' perspectives regarding having their general practitioner (GP) use a proactive approach to smoking cessation treatment using an encounter decision aid (DA), and (2) their expectations regarding their GP's role. We conducted qualitative semi-structured interviews with participants of the FIRST randomized trial (adults who smoke daily with any level of motivation for tobacco quitting). In the FIRST study, the intervention was a half-day course teaching GPs to use a proactive approach using a DA. Control GPs received a 1-h refresher training. Phone interviews were run 5-16 weeks after a routine visit with their GP. A thematic data analysis was performed with 20% double independent coding. We conducted 20 semi-structured interviews (mean age 49 years, 55% female). In the intervention group (n = 12), 7 participants appreciated the DA, saw it as useful, usable, and valuable. Two participants did not find it helpful and 3 did not recall having used it. Participants felt their GP provided moral support, more than from a specialist (cardiologist or pulmonologist) because their GP knows them better and has more time during the visit. They felt that the most important factor influencing smoking cessation was their own motivation, not treatment. Most participants appreciated the DA. Most participants did not perceive medications as part of quitting. They thought quitting was a matter of motivation. A DA could be an acceptable way to encourage use of treatments to aid with tobacco cessation. An early presentation of treatment options to all persons who smokes may encourage them to request a treatment when ready to quit smoking. Patient perceptions of the role of GPs and treatments for smoking cessation may be a barrier to seeking help to quit.

Indexed as

decision aidprimary caresmoking cessation

Identifiers

PMID39669670
PMCPMC11635857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.