ArticleGenetics in medicine open2024
Detection and characterization of copy-number variants from exome sequencing in the DDD study.
Article in Genetics in medicine open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in clinical genetics: Current practice and attitudes among the clinical genetics workforce.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2026Article
- Review
- Pangenomes aid accurate detection of large insertions and deletions from targeted sequencing: the case of cardiomyopathies.Genome medicine · 2026Article
- Copy number variant analysis by exome sequencing is an effective approach to optimize diagnostic yield for developmental disorders-the DDD-Africa study.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Rare 19q13.42 duplication encompassingTranslational pediatrics · 2026Article
- Moderate Diagnostic Yield of Exome Sequencing in Fetal Growth Restriction: Retrospective Insights.Prenatal diagnosis · 2026Article
- Completely resolved structural variants by optical genome mapping with adaptive sampling from CNV discovery.NPJ genomic medicine · 2026Article
- Copy Number Variant analysis by exome sequencing is an effective approach to optimize diagnostic yield for developmental disorders - the DDD-Africa study.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Genetic architecture and prognostic significance of suspected fetal microcephaly: evidence from prenatal exome sequencing in a large prospective cohort.Human genomics · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-assisted clinical exome sequencing: Insights and outcomes from 822 pediatric diagnoses.Genetics in medicine open · 2026Article
- High positive predictive value of CNVs detected by clinical exome sequencing in suspected genetic diseases.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Structural variants such as multiexon deletions and duplications are an important cause of disease but are often overlooked in standard exome/genome sequencing analysis. We aimed to evaluate the detection of copy-number variants (CNVs) from exome sequencing (ES) in comparison with genome-wide low-resolution and exon-resolution chromosomal microarrays (CMAs) and to characterize the properties of de novo CNVs in a large clinical cohort. Methods: We performed CNV detection using ES of 9859 parent-offspring trios in the Deciphering Developmental Disorders (DDD) study and compared them with CNVs detected from exon-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization in 5197 probands from the DDD study. Results: Integrating calls from multiple ES-based CNV algorithms using random forest machine learning generated a higher quality data set than using individual algorithms. Both ES- and array comparative genomic hybridization-based approaches had the same sensitivity of 89% and detected the same number of unique pathogenic CNVs not called by the other approach. Of DDD probands prescreened with low-resolution CMAs, 2.6% had a pathogenic CNV detected by higher-resolution assays. De novo CNVs were strongly enriched in known DD-associated genes and exhibited no bias in parental age or sex. Conclusion: ES-based CNV calling has higher sensitivity than low-resolution CMAs currently in clinical use and comparable sensitivity to exon-resolution CMA. With sufficient investment in bioinformatic analysis, exome-based CNV detection could replace low-resolution CMA for detecting pathogenic CNVs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.