ArticleGenetics in medicine open2024
Returning actionable genetic results to participants in the biobank at the Colorado Center for Personalized Medicine and UCHealth.
Article in Genetics in medicine open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The European Health Data Space and biobanking in Europe: synergies, tensions and the future governance of data-driven health research.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To describe our process for returning genetic results to participants in the Colorado Center for Personalized Medicine biobank. Methods: Enrollment in the biobank is open to all adult UCHealth patients. Participants who provided a sample that was genotyped and signed the proper consent were eligible to receive results. Genetic data were generated using a custom genotyping array and confirmed via Sanger sequencing. We used 2 models for returning results and conducted interviews with participants to assess satisfaction with our process, follow-up care, and family communication. Results: As of July 2022, 73,313 participants had provided a sample and proper consent. Of these, 10,489 samples were genotyped, 137 (1.3%) had initial results, and 62 were confirmed and eligible for return. We returned results to 51 participants, 33% for cardiac risk, 31% cancer, 15% familial hypercholesterolemia, and 21% for other conditions (11 participants refused or did not respond). Less than half of participants had a relevant family history. The majority of participants were glad to receive results and satisfied with our process. Conclusion: Although array-based genotyping has known limitations that reduce its accuracy, we were able to identify persons with underlying genetic risk who were previously unaware. It is important to establish a process for returning results that follows clinical guidelines, protects participant autonomy, and is amenable to all participants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.