ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024
Mucosal vaccination with outer membrane vesicles derived from
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanisms of natural and vaccine-induced immunity to Bordetella pertussis.PLoS pathogens · 2026Review
- Unadjuvanted antenatal pertussis OMV vaccination drives enhanced and durable humoral immunity in offspring.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Tiny packages, big potential: bacterial membrane vesicles in vaccinology.Microbial cell factories · 2025Review
- Outer Membrane Vesicles as a Versatile Platform for Vaccine Development: Engineering Strategies, Applications and Challenges.Journal of extracellular vesicles · 2025Review
- Harnessing outer membrane vesicles derived fromFrontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: We previously identified Methods: We assessed different mucosal administration strategies in a murine model, including homologous mucosal 2-dose prime-boost schedules and heterologous prime-boost strategies combining intramuscular (IM) systemic immunization with mucosal routes (intranasal, IN; or sublingual, SL). We utilized alum and c-di-AMP as adjuvants for the systemic and mucosal formulations of the OMV vaccine prototype, respectively. A homologous prime/boost IM immunization schedule and commercial vaccines were used for comparisons. Results: All tested heterologous schemes induced higher levels of specific IgG with significant avidity, as well as higher levels of IgG1 and IgG2c, compared to the corresponding homologous prime-boost 2-dose schemes via mucosal routes (OMV Conclusions: All the experiments presented here demonstrate that the use of OMVs, regardless of the scheme applied (except for OMV
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.