ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024
Evaluating the prognostic potential of telomerase signature in breast cancer through advanced machine learning model.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer prognosis remains a significant challenge due to the disease's molecular heterogeneity and complexity. Accurate predictive models are critical for improving patient outcomes and tailoring personalized therapies. Methods: We developed a Machine Learning-assisted Telomerase Signature (MLTS) by integrating multi-omics data from nine independent breast cancer datasets. Using multiple machine learning algorithms, we identified six telomerase-related genes significantly associated with patient survival. The predictive performance of MLTS was evaluated against 66 existing breast cancer prognostic models across diverse cohorts. Results: The MLTS demonstrated superior predictive accuracy, stability, and reliability compared to other models. Patients with high MLTS scores exhibited increased tumor mutational burden, chromosomal instability, and poor survival outcomes. Single-cell RNA sequencing analysis further revealed higher MLTS scores in aneuploid tumor cells, suggesting a role in cancer progression. Immune profiling indicated distinct tumor microenvironment characteristics associated with MLTS scores, potentially guiding therapeutic decisions. Conclusions: Our findings highlight the utility of MLTS as a robust prognostic biomarker for breast cancer. The ability of MLTS to predict patient outcomes and its association with key genomic and cellular features underscore its potential as a target for personalized therapy. Future research may focus on integrating MLTS with additional molecular signatures to enhance its clinical application in precision oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.