Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39669540›Full record

ReviewPsychiatric research and clinical practice2024

Anxiety and Depression Among Adults and Children With Celiac Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Different Psychiatry Scales.

Mostafa Hossam-Eldin Moawad, Ibrahim Serag, Mahmoud Mohamed Shalaby, Mohamed Smail Aissani, Mohammed Ahmed Sadeq, Nada Ibrahim Hendi, Bashaer Elawfi, Reem Mohamed Farouk Ghorab, Naydeen Mostafa, Nancy Ibrahim and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Psychiatric research and clinical practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Mostafa Hossam-Eldin MoawadClinical Department Faculty of Pharmacy Alexandria University Alexandria Egypt.
Ibrahim SeragFaculty of Medicine Mansoura University Mansoura Egypt.
Mahmoud Mohamed ShalabyFaculty of Medicine Ain Shams University Cairo Egypt.
Mohamed Smail AissaniUniversity Blida 01 Blida Algeria.
Mohammed Ahmed SadeqEmergency Medicine Department El Sheikh Zayed Specialized Hospital El Sheikh Zayed City Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1416-1134
Nada Ibrahim HendiFaculty of Medicine Ain Shams University Cairo Egypt.
Bashaer ElawfiFaculty of Medicine Sana'a University Sana'a Yemen.
Reem Mohamed Farouk GhorabEmergency Medicine Department El Sheikh Zayed Specialized Hospital El Sheikh Zayed City Egypt.
Naydeen MostafaFaculty of Medicine Ain Shams University Cairo Egypt.
Nancy IbrahimFaculty of Medicine Alexandria University Alexandria Egypt.
Hasnaa Ali Hassan AbdelrhemMARS-GLOBAL London UK.
Ahmed Hassan A RadyFaculty of Medicine Ain Shams University Cairo Egypt.
Muhammad AlkasabyCentre for Global Mental Health London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9723-7706

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Celiac disease (CD) is an autoimmune disorder in which genetically susceptible individuals cannot digest gluten (wheat) and its homologs such as Scalin (rye) and Hordein (barley). Aim: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the measures of associations between CD and psychiatric disorders, specifically anxiety and depression, and explore the relationship between adherence to a Gluten-Free Diet (GFD) and the psychiatric aspects of the disease. Methods: We searched PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science for articles investigating anxiety and depression in CD patients. The following inclusion criteria were implemented: Primary research articles (either observational or experimental) that include participants with a CD diagnosis -confirmed either serologically, with anti-endomysial antibodies, anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies, or with duodenum biopsy, whether on a GFD or not,-who have depression or anxiety symptoms identified through self-report or clinician-administered scales. Results: CD patients are at a higher odds of developing anxiety, as the odds ratio was (OR: 2.26, 95% CI: [1.10, 4.67]) and depression symptoms (OR: 3.36, 95% CI: [1.36, 8.32]). Results of both State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Y-1 and Y-2 improved after 1 year of GFD with mean difference of 3.48, 95% CI: (0.26, 6.71), and MD: 3.45, 95% CI: (1.39, 5.52), respectively. Conclusion: Anxiety and depression are prevalent among adults and children CD patients as they are observed to have high odds of anxiety and depression as expressed by various scales. It is reported that GFD is associated with decreased levels of anxiety and depression, however, further studies are required to confirm these findings and to investigate the main mechanism of psychiatric disorders among CD patients.

Identifiers

PMID39669540
PMCPMC11633532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.