ArticleTherapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism2024
Diagnostic efficacy of aldosterone-to-renin ratio to screen primary aldosteronism in hypertension: a systemic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Therapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) is commonly used for screening primary aldosteronism (PA) in patients with difficult-to-control hypertension. Various thresholds have been proposed for the confirmatory tests, leading to inconsistency in the results. Objectives: This study aimed to elucidate the performance of ARR screening in hypertensive patients. Design: Systemic review and meta-analysis. Data sources and methods: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched from inception to January 2024. Studies that used the ARR to screen for PA and provided a comprehensive probability panel specifically focusing on hypertensive individuals were considered for enrollment. Pooled diagnostic efficacy was evaluated, and subgroup analyses and meta-regression were conducted based on different demographic and clinical parameters. Results: Eighteen observational studies encompassing 7150 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The overall prevalence of PA in the hypertensive cohort was 15.2%, and pooled sensitivity and specificity were 81.6% and 93.3%, respectively, resulting in a diagnostic odds ratio of 62.0. Fagan's nomogram showed that a positive ARR increased the post-test probability to 80% from a pre-test probability of 25%. Summary receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed an area under the curve of 94.7%. Notably, analysis of variability demonstrated that the diagnostic performance was consistent across either ARR based on plasma renin activity or direct renin concentration, geographic region, sex, mean age, potassium level, and systolic blood pressure. Conclusion: ARR was validated as a viable screening methodology for PA in hypertensive individuals. Moreover, its diagnostic efficacy remained unchanged across diverse clinical contexts. Future studies are warranted to refine ARR methodologies and enhance diagnostic accuracy. Trial registration: PROSPERO ID number CRD42023493680. Infographics:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.